Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Belfior]

I just hope Kabanadze and other inventors realize that sitting on these devices will just play into these "J.P Morgan" type magnate's pockets. I understand that an inventor would like compensation for all he years of work he/she has put into the device, but when he is killed does this planet have another 100 years to wait for another invention?

Like I have this modest plan of putting all free energy related stuff out there for free and make something out of the residual inventions that come up in the process. When you play a lot around magnets and devices you come up with lots of stuff not related to free energy.

Free energy must be accompanied by anti-gravity also. I suspect he US already has this and there are couple of "patriots" guarding the Lockheed-Martin hangars. I mean if India and Africa are given free energy we need place to put this people that come out of it. Greed and nationalism will take care of us in the next 100 years, if we don't figure this out.

[MonsieurX]

Thanks for the answers.
The failures of our attempts to operate T. K.'s reply is due to our ignorance of the operation of the Ether.
An attempt at explanation was described by a French engineer on the site Karmapolis.
See the link: https://www.karmapolis.be/pipeline/holodynamique.html
It's in French unfortunately for you, but it does not help me any more.
I only remember that there are "particles" vibrating at very high frequency. Hypothesis ?
If it is true, the apparatus of T.K. would come to disrupt these particles and put at our disposal energy.
The key is I think the Nanosecond generator and its frequency, and the width of the pulses.
I will try to collect some material including TL.
Of course I have an oscilloscope + measuring equipment.
Here. What scheme? That of T.K. of origin.

[NickZ]

  In this forum thread we are not trying to replicate the Tariel Kapanadze devices. Mainly due to the lack of proper build information.
We have been working on replications from other guys that have shown similar self running devices, but which are showing full schematics as well as videos of their devices.
  If interested please let us know and I can place some youtube links so that you can check them out for yourself.
 
   There is also another thread on this forum, which deals with the actual Kapanadze devices.
   

[NickZ]

  Itsu:
  I've now changed the TL494's previous 104 frequency capacitor, and the #5 pin resistor, to the recommended 102 cap, and a 2.2k resistor.  And now it seams to be working at the proper frequency range. However, my square wave signal now looks like this (below). The sec/div setting is at 20us, in case you can't read it properly.
  Please let me know at what frequency it's running at now at that setting. So that I can compare that to what I think that it is running at.
  Is that wave form normal for a square wave signal, or not? As it's not showing the normal square wave now, as it had been previously.

  The upper probe signal is on one mosfet's drain, and the lower signal is on the other mosfet's gate.
The fets are Not firing at the same time now, and the signals readings are the same, or very similar on both fets.

  I'm still running the same duty cycle controls using a 10k resistor through the 50k pot, as it was before. But, the duty cycle readings seam to be slightly lower than 44% or so, compared to what they were previously, at the full duty cycle settings. The setting is at maximum duty cycle.
  If needed I can replace the duty cycle's 10k resistor and 50k trim pot back to the 20k pot that I had on previously, as well as the resistor to a 12k, if needed.
  Below are my scope shots. Let me know what you think.
 

[TinselKoala]

Nick:

Assuming you have probes positioned properly and no channel inversions going on.... the Drain trace seems to be indicating that the mosfets are not turning OFF very sharply. They are turning ON rapidly which is good. Do you have pull-down resistors between the Drain and Source of the mosfets? And perhaps also between the Pin 2 logic inputs of the 4420 driver chips and Ground (source)?

Since the mosfets work by charging the Gate to turn the mosfet ON, you need to provide a path for the charge to leave the gate in order for the mosfet to turn OFF again. Normally the driver chips can do this, but it looks like they aren't quite keeping up so you may need to experiment with pull-down resistors from Gate to Source to improve the turn-off times.

Mosfet Drain traces can be confusing because with N-channel mosfets the Drain signal should be HIGH when the mosfet is OFF and goes LOW when the mosfet turns ON.

Since you are showing the Gate of one mosfet and the Drain of the other one, the timing looks like it is right, with the Drain of the one mosfet going LOW (turning on) when the other mosfet's gate signal is LOW (turning off). However I am still concerned about the timing (dead time, or overlap). It might be easier to tell if you simply showed both Drains, instead of one Drain and the other Gate.

For capacitor values: when you see a number like 104,  you should read this as "10 and 4 more zeros" in picoFarads. So 104 = 100000 pF, or 100 nF, or 0.1 uF. And 102 means 1000 pF, which is 1 nF or 0.001 uF. 

See my annotations on your scopeshot for determining frequency from the scope trace and timebase setting.