Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

The diagrams you just posted show incorrect field vectors where CW and CCW meet. The field vectors like that are only when same pole magnetic orientation meet the gap.

The CW and CCW winding direction does not determine the magnetic poles, alone. That was the puenta of my post.
I still think that my diagram is correct, including the leakage flux outside of the core.

Feel free to draw the magnetic flux lines as you think they should appear inside the core and outside of it (leakage) and we can discuss it.

I don't think DonL was upset by the scientific content of my post.  I think that he did not like me writing that the winding configuration depicted in Diag.2a and Diag.2b is useless for secondary windings, where the magnetic flux is created by a 3rd primary winding elsewhere on the core acting as a primary.

Nonetheless I stand by that assertion, even if it upsets him.

the  reveals itself only from second property of magnets when main magnetic field is canceled.

My diagrams do not illustrate any "scalar magnetic field". My diagrams illustrates only the lines of magnetic flux.
...but please feel free to draw this "scalar magnetic field", too.

[Thaelin]

My My but things sure got silent here quick.  This new scheme must have some merit to it.
Any updates at all?

thay

[Grumage]

My My but things sure got silent here quick.  This new scheme must have some merit to it.
Any updates at all?

thay

Dear Thaelin.

Progress is slow but sure. I have T2 fully wound with internal standing wave coils (43 turns forward then back) at each end from the middle. These coils are also wound in the same direction from the middle to the ends. Then the 86 turn coil is served counter wound over the previous. And finally centrally positioned (But can be moved) is the 7 turn primary made from 8 mm dia Copper tube.

In the absence of a Ferrite TV yoke I have chosen a high permeability pair of Ferrite "U" section cores for the drive transformer. The 12 turn primaries having an Inductance of 0.4 m Henry each. With an
operating frequency of 100 Khz this should present an impeedance of approx 251.3 Ohms. However this calculation is based upon a Sinus signal. Maybe, dear Verpies, you could check this out? As the transformer is being driven by a square wave not a sine wave!!

Apart from that I have obtained a VERY expensive pair of IGBT's to push the primary drive transformer. And I treated myself to, a new to me, 200 mHZ Scope. In the absence of a manual it has taken a few hours to work out what all the buttons do

The bug's will be in the resonator. T-1000 likens this to a "Half Hendershot" with the capacitor being formed from Aluminium foil within the form of T2 in parallel with a choke coil. The values of this will have to be found by trial and error!!

I will try to post some pic's of progress over the weekend.

Nos Da. Grum.

[verpies]

The 12 turn primaries having an Inductance of 0.4 m Henry each. With an operating frequency of 100 Khz this should present an impedance of approx 251.3 Ohms. However this calculation is based upon a Sinus signal. Maybe, dear Verpies, you could check this out? As the transformer is being driven by a square wave not a sine wave!!

For 100kHz sine wave into 0.4mH inductor:      X_L=2π*f*L       --> 6.283*100000*0.0004 = 251.3Ω
For 100kHz square wave into 0.4mH inductor: X_L=(16/π)*f*L  --> 5.093*100000*0.0004 = 204.7Ω

Inductive reactance for a square wave is always 81% of the reactance for a sine wave of the same frequency.

[URFA]

Hello to all.
I am new here.
I watched Akula's videos and I would like to share some pictures what I see in the video.
I wrote some thoughts but the webpage does not open for a few days.Dally Free Energy webpage 128 still showing a blank page. 
My English is not good, sorry for this.