Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 135 Guests are viewing this topic.

AlienGrey

Quote from: onepower on August 23, 2018, 08:48:46 PM
Bolt
I have clocked an Arduino Uno into the 100nS range and it was solid. Not to mention the fact that we can adjust the offset and frequency between multiple channels on the fly. The problem I see is that the good old days were never that good and spending endless hours under the fog of a soldering iron for a decade or so was not all that productive. With a PLC we can throw together a multi-channel, multi-frequency oscillator with any offset or timing function we want. It is so damn easy it boggles the mind compared to the fiasco of breadboarding and soldering all that crap together which never really worked all that well anyways.

Do you know what is brilliant?, the fact that with something as simple as a $10 Arduino we are in control... think about it. If I actually wanted to use that grey matter between my ears I would let a computer do all the hard work. I would set up my circuit then program a sweep function of one frequency relative to another as a variable offset/variable frequency then log the output. Follow my logic?, we are looking for something and you can waste hundreds of hours of your time trying to manually change the variables or have a computer change the variables and tell you what works. This is the fundamental premise of why computers were invented to do all the heavy lifting and number crunching for us.

Why in gods name you people feel so compelled to do everything the hard way and waste your time is beyond me. Set up a test circuit, program your micro-computer to sweep through as many variables as possible, log the inputs vs output and it will basically tell you where all the sweet spots are. I built and programmed a circuit using an Arduino Uno with a piezo beeper in about 6 hours to tell me when the COP is greater than 1 and the output has exceeded the input. It just scans through all the possible variables and when the COP>1... it beeps. So our computer looks at the data and and which variables worked and gives us the answer... not that difficult.

In my opinion we have to move past the average dark ages thinking and embrace the future. We have tools at our disposal and access to knowledge like no other time in history... use them.
Well you obviously haven't found the correct pulse width yet  and what is your gap between each pulse ? and what is the cpu's clock speed
(16mhz) and does it divide it by 4 ? Not many devices will or can operate at that speed for long your getting very close to electron rise times in conductors, another problem you dont have linear control as you can only advance in blocks of your clock speed and you have yet to find another
little surprise micro chips and fly back pulses have, but never the less there are better chips with 100mz clocks with pipe lining that can handle
high speed, any way i wish you the very best!

AG

DreamThinkBuild

Hi OnePower,

A Arduino compatible Teensy 3.6(180Mhz OC to 240Mhz) is pretty fast for signal processing. It has a built in FPU and two DAC's. It uses 3.3v but using a bi-directional level shift you can go to 5v. I've successfully used these for projects.

https://www.pjrc.com/teensy/techspecs.html

bolt

Quite a few 3.3v boards around with good spec and i got an ESP8266 which has on board wifi so you can tune your device while away from home via a web page. :)


BUT many of these boards are buggy with immature coding and dont have the support of Arduino even though they say there are compatible they are not. Plus its yet another voltage to think about doing level shifting. So now you probably need 3.3, 5, 9v 12, 15, and 24v floating around all over the place to make a Ruslan coil banger thing. The main reason i opted for microcontroller is for frequency generation and stability.  The number one problem builders face when tuning these things is drifting oscillators.  Kacher is hopeless and even the TL494 was never designed to be rock stable as its supposed to work on a feedback loop so it has just a simple RC timer on board. This will drift 10's Hz over a few minutes.  So i found out you can clock a TL494 and so now its another issue resolved. You strap the Resistor pin on dead time to +5v ref so its disabled it will default to 1% internally then clock the C pin on the OSC to take over both frequency and duty. Mine will go down to 1Hz to 75Khz as each pulse is shared 50 50 to the output so the actual clock will run up to 150Khz.

So yes a good coder can use A.I. like particle swarm optimisation "PSO is a metaheuristic as it makes few or no assumptions about the problem being optimized and can search very large spaces of candidate solutions. However, metaheuristics such as PSO do not guarantee an optimal solution is ever found. Also, PSO does not use the gradient of the problem being optimized, which means PSO does not require that the optimization problem be differentiable as is required by classic optimization methods such as gradient descent and quasi-newton methods"

Or neural networks to fine tune 50 variables self tuning to give 5kw just program it and sit back and wait till it finds the results. The results can then be stored and sent to another user as an ECU MAP. Future devices can then be black boxed with fixed power ratings. You want your 2kw upgraded to 4kw fine send me $2000 and i send you the 4kw upgrade MAP:)

bolt

Thoughts of the day...The answer to the universe and everything:)




" Standing waves are formed by the superposition of two travelling waves of the same frequency (with the same polarisation and the same amplitude) travelling in opposite directions. This is usually achieved by using a travelling wave and its reflection, which will ensure that the frequency is exactly the same."

Now push it along with a Tesla sync packet burst. :)

AlienGrey

Quote from: bolt on August 29, 2018, 07:08:58 PM
Thoughts of the day...The answer to the universe and everything:)




" Standing waves are formed by the superposition of two travelling waves of the same frequency (with the same polarisation and the same amplitude) travelling in opposite directions. This is usually achieved by using a travelling wave and its reflection, which will ensure that the frequency is exactly the same."

Now push it along with a Tesla sync packet burst. :)
I thought they were created by winding the second winding the other way and badly tuned co-ax transmission lines. but they blow up
the TX module with the over load unless you know what your doing