Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 95 Guests are viewing this topic.

00

Quote from: Hoppy on September 13, 2013, 12:10:59 PM
OK, so I'll take it that you didn't test it for OU.

If you wind opposing coils like you show in your flyback schematic, then you will just end up with a hot ferrite and a lot less output than if you had connected the two coils conventionally with a centre tap for the Royer oscillator, which is basically what you show.

hi hoppy!

we have to kill lenz. thats what we are doing it. if you follow conventional electrical practices which just try to enhance efficiency to reach 100% thats not the route to follow. overunity needs unconventional workout. whatever you say but later on you will be following what i have proposed. avoid transformer action where load fetches more current from the power source. as long as you follow  efficiency route to lower input you will never have overunity. overunity devices dont work on conventional physics which follow efficiency route.

00
:)

guruji

Hi 00
my 220ohm resistors are 5w does this effect the circuit?
cause today I tried this but could not get any spark ok mine is 12T on both sides I will try 9T.
Thanks


00

Quote from: guruji on September 13, 2013, 02:33:03 PM
Hi 00
my 220ohm resistors are 5w does this effect the circuit?
cause today I tried this but could not get any spark ok mine is 12T on both sides I will try 9T.
Thanks

5 watts  is used for iron cored 12-0-12 primary and it has many number of turns so then only you need 5 watts and here you are using just 9 turns. yes 5 watts is too much. use 1/2 watt. moreover you can attach 20 nf caps CERAMIC NON POLAR across the both resistors and one across the two ends of the coil left end and right end. i did not have any problem running it. but later i attached 20 nf  caps. the spark needed is very small not much powerful the alluminium core coil does all the work to  power the bulb. if you are not able to run my specified circuit then just run your own what you had been running for spark production but it must not be very strong coz its just needed to start the process of oscillation between thick copper coil and 1 mkfd cap on primary. spark is just make and break mechanism and work is mainly done by the frequency. when frequency dont match you wont have output. its like tunning radio to a broadcasting station.
vary the cap on secondary to tune  by sliding coils.

00
:)


Hoppy

Quote from: 00 on September 13, 2013, 05:42:28 PM
5 watts  is used for iron cored 12-0-12 primary and it has many number of turns so then only you need 5 watts and here you are using just 9 turns.

00
:)

What would you suggest as an alternative to a flyback transformer?