Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Grumage]

Dear Verpies and all.

I am just thinking out loud and asking some questions at the same time.

Going back to Nick's erroneous statement regarding Tesla's opening a switch.... Closing onto a large DC network caused the "radiant energy" spikes to manifest themselves.

The thought.

The Dally device uses a Co axial conductor. A lot like a very long cable which has a capacitance. You slam on to it a high voltage. This rapidly charges the cable and suddenly there is a backlash of energy.
What caused it? Is there something special happening? Or was this phenomenon that Tesla witnessed made into his famous Tesla coil? And nothing more than that?

Obviously if yes is the answer to the above question, then we are on a "Goose chase"!! And any energy gain seen must be due to some other means, the most likely of which is NMR.

Cheers Grum.

[NickZ]

  The goose chase has always been the case, however we may be able to make some head way on it, if we had better means to replicate the shown Akula effects. But, lets not get hung on the open or closed switch idea. I mention Akula because he is one of the few people that has been able to not only find the way to produce a big output from a small input, and also feed-back to keep it going by itself. But, also able to keep the system from frying the mosfets, at least to some degree.
  Although I think that you misunderstood my point that I made previously of the meaning of "shorting" which normally implies a short circuit to ground, and not one to an available capacitor, of a spinning mechanical generator circuit. Also, how is a mosfet or transistor going to "short" the circuit right at the top of the peak?  However Akula has been able to demonstrate that he has had some success at obtaining a higher output, as well as the self runner, one way or another.
  This video by Ismael is describing what he thinks is happening, and his solutions to the "shorting" problem.  Only that he is not telling the most important point. Which is how to effectively keep the transistor/mosfet circuit from burning out from the higher power spikes.  But, in any case, his explanation is quite clear, IF true.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv7C7YOetDY

[forest]

  The goose chase has always been the case, however we may be able to make some head way on it, if we had better means to replicate the shown Akula effects. But, lets not get hung on the open or closed switch idea. I mention Akula because he is one of the few people that has been able to not only find the way to produce a big output from a small input, and also feed-back to keep it going by itself. But, also able to keep the system from frying the mosfets, at least to some degree.
  Although I think that you misunderstood my point that I made previously of the meaning of "shorting" which normally implies a short circuit to ground, and not one to an available capacitor, of a spinning mechanical generator circuit. Also, how is a mosfet or transistor going to "short" the circuit right at the top of the peak?  However Akula has been able to demonstrate that he has had some success at obtaining a higher output, as well as the self runner, one way or another.
  This video by Ismael is describing what he thinks is happening, and his solutions to the "shorting" problem.  Only that he is not telling the most important point. Which is how to effectively keep the transistor/mosfet circuit from burning out from the higher power spikes.  But, in any case, his explanation is quite clear, IF true.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv7C7YOetDY

I bet the most efficient way is to not have transistor at all...but we run too far into the future I think. That was the prediction from Tesla interview...

[NickZ]

   As the transistor is the leakest link, it would be best to totally avoid it, if possible. Especially considering the price of the IGBT transistors, and expence of  a propietary owned  and custom designed mosfet filter system to protect the gates, from huge spikes.
Then there are people like Kapanadze that makes it all work using old junk parts.   
Sooooo, what's up with that??? 

  It would be a welcome change to see a video of someone actually living in their home, that has a working house-hold Kapanadze type electricity producing system, that has no external man made input to it,  yet works,   and that's it,  and that's all.
 
 

[forest]

   As the transistor is the leakest link, it would be best to totally avoid it, if possible. Especially considering the price of the IGBT transistors, and expence of  a propietary owned  and custom designed mosfet filter system to protect the gates, from huge spikes.
Then there are people like Kapanadze that makes it all work using old junk parts.   
Sooooo, what's up with that??? 

  It would be a welcome change to see a video of someone actually living in their home, that has a working house-hold Kapanadze type electricity producing system, that has no external man made input to it,  yet works,   and that's it,  and that's all.
 

It depends on what you count as "using old junk parts" . Those parts are sometimes much better then most IGBT nowadays , for example old russian transistors. Two of them can pass 23A easily without worry about spikes.... but for a short time period.....
ANyway, eliminating transistor or mosfet is a perfect idea.