Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 92 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

Robert Adams used a type of opened end magnetic path and got massive efficiency in the 800% range so there has to be something to it.

dieter

Marathonman,


You mean Adams from NZ who made the Adams motor that later became the Bedini SSG? Have you got any links?


Hanon,


You are right, neighter BiTT cores nor caps are part of the Figuera Patent. But it may be interesting to see further things you can do with the tri-coil device. And if there's free energy, we will take it anyway I guess.


Now, the simplicity of the following is surprising, considering the impact it may have, while it seems to be unused:


The cap brings the voltage in a -90° phase to the current, right? We know an inductor causes the magnetic field immediately. It is the induced, that brings the current in -90°, right? (or we could say the voltage in +90°.)
So what is probably happening here, is: The inducer works 90° out of phase all the time, so it dissipates only reactive energy, the induced does however work normally, except in this BiTT it will not return the Back MMF to Sender, but deflect it to the additional core parts, so the primaries are not affected.


Fact is, it worked only within about 50 to 150 uF. But we should also mention, that it doesn't mean much when such a wall wattmeter reads zero Watt. Although, with the wrong capacity it read 7 watt, so...


Regards



Doug1

Sorry I didn't see the question before.

Quote from: NRamaswami on April 02, 2014, 09:54:12 AM
Hi Doug:

I have to admit that I have not used a resistor in between the coils in my tests while using low voltage and high amperage currents. If it works it is fine as it can cut down on the amount of wire and can reduce the cost significantly.

What is the kind of resistance that you would advise to be used for a 12 volts and 16 amps current source. It is a pretty decent 192 watts and the amperage is also significant.

12 watts or 12v one amp.



Assume we have two inductors and one induced.

Should we use the resistors between the transformer output wires and the inductors if the inductors are in parallel.

Should we use the 3 resistors if the inductors are in series. one from transformer to primary 1 beginning, one between primary 1 end to primary 2 beginneing and one between primary 2 end to transformer.

Now what is the kind of resistance that you would advise to be used in these places for the current source of 16 amps and 12 volts. Please advise and let me test. I will post results after testing.

Like the picture,I added the switch according to the text.
"Here what it is constantly changing is the intensity of the excitatory current which drives the electromagnets and this is accomplished using a resistance,through which circulates a proper current, which is taken from one foreign origin into one or more electromagnets, magnetize one or more electromagnets and while the current is >higher or lower<(not on or off) the magnetization of the electromagnets is decreasing or increasing and varying (not off), >therefore the intensity of the magnetic field is the flow which crosses the induced circuit<.
As seen in the patent drawing the current, once that has made its function, returns to the generator where taken;(no it doesn't really show that) naturally in every revolution of the brush will be a change of sign in the induced current(? does that imply the induced circuit is returned to the same connections of the source) but a switch will do it continuous if wanted( what switch? A switch instead of the resister aray? Or it is switched from the original source to a self acting mode). From this current is derived a small part to excite the machine converting it in self-exciting and to operate the small motor which moves the brush and the switch( and? not or?); the external current supply, this is the feeding current, is removed and the machine continue working without any help indefinitely.

First. Give completely for free, electrical currents continuous or alternate of any voltage and applicable to:

Take some consideration that in Tesla's patent Method of obtaining direct currents from alternating currents #413,353. A stationary magnetic field can be used to block half the wave form of an alternating current to produce dc current. The inducers if provided with low current continuously and alternately given impulses of higher current still maintains the requirement of acting like a diode while shifting the field strength between the inducers. So long as the magnetic poles do not reverse. The only way to keep all this activity is to keep the inducers fields apart. NN or SS with induced in between.

NRamaswami

Hi Doug:

Thank you very much..It does appear that adding a resistor to the primary would decrease substantially the input amperage and V=IR(and power factor in AC). When power factor remains the same adding a resistor to the primary should bring down the amperage in the primary. Yes it must certainly reduce the length of the coil used and result in considerable savings on wire and we can use less wire of greater size. Probably this is why the resistor circuit was used by Figuera to send the current to the primary electromagnets. Let me check that and confirm to you. I will need to check if the output amperage and voltage remains the same after the input amperage is brought down. Again Thank you very much for the enlightening guidance. I'm obliged.

Doug1

There was a time in early history when people made their own resisters actually not that far back. Made from common and handy junk they had laying around, graphite makes a nice resister if you can get it. I like pencil refills. If it goes poof so what cut another one a little longer or use a small diameter wire it also acts as a fuse and can be used to build a carbon light in a pinch. I doubt they had radio shack or nicrome wire in the late 1800's.If they did it wasnt easy to get. You could build a very nice rotating resister distributor that is adjustable in the resistance at each segment with it;s own sliding contact so the contacts can be moved up and down the resister material.