Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Qwert]

QWERT, why are you doing that ?     Figuera device SURELY worked fine. It is a FACT not our supposition.

According to all available articles, there are only witnesses that Figuera said so; no witness had seen it with his own eyes.

[iflewmyown]

Back then the patent office required a working model. One patent issued was tested after patented and reported to the patent office as working.
Garry

[Qwert]

Back then the patent office required a working model. One patent issued was tested after patented and reported to the patent office as working.
Garry

Any reference to this info?

[hanon]

Quote from: iflewmyown on Today at 03:58:23 AMBack then the patent office required a working model. One patent issued was tested after patented and reported to the patent office as working.

Any reference to this info?

This test was carried out in 1913, 5 years after Figuera´s death, because one his partner, Buforn, was kept on trying to commercialize this generator and filed 5 more patents all of them similar to the one from 1908. This test report  is kept in the Patent Office as a proof of practical implementation of the generator, a mandatory step to get the patent granted in those days. This patent was granted. It is a pity that the report of the test doesn´t not include if the machine was self-running apart from producing electricity. What was the reason to follow a dead end after 5 years?  For me it is clear. We have collected many proofs. For anyone who has some doubts:  please read the webpage deeply before going into questions. This test report was already posted in the forum some weeks ago.

http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/test.pdf

http://www.alpoma.net/tecob/?page_id=8258

[Qwert]

This test was carried out in 1913, 5 years after Figuera´s death, because one his partner, Buforn, was kept on trying to commercialize this generator and filed 5 more patents all of them similar to the one from 1908. This test report  is kept in the Patent Office as a proof of practical implementation of the generator, a mandatory step to get the patent granted in those days. This patent was granted. It is a pity that the report of the test doesn´t not include if the machine was self-running apart from producing electricity. What was the reason to follow a dead end after 5 years?  For me it is clear. We have collected many proofs. For anyone who has some doubts:  please read the webpage deeply before going into questions. This test report was already posted in the forum some weeks ago.

http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/test.pdf

http://www.alpoma.net/tecob/?page_id=8258

These articles suggest that these patents are complete, while our replicators suggest that these patents must be incomplete. Where is the truth?

Here is an excerpt from the second link's article, the author says:

"I don´t doubt that in the coil induced currents are generated, as he thought, but to pretend that more energy is generated in the coil or set of coils, which is needed to generate the inductive fields, even if they vary over time very rapidly, is an illusion."