Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

Doug1

Exactly ! the amount of strange patents prove something is fishy inside our books, incomplete.

hanon

Quote from: ~Maverick~ on November 26, 2014, 11:18:58 PM
Nice thread.
Does anyone have a link to the complete Buforn 1910 - 1914 patent? I know sections have been translated however I am interested in the whole document(in English). Google translate doesn't do a good job.

Thanks for any help.

This is the only file with Buforn´s patents. It is the original spanish text. There are not translations into english

http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/buforn.pdf

I have read them and all Buforn´s patent are exact copies one on the other and all are copies of the Figuera 1908 patent. You can see it just by comparing the figures in Buforn´s patents and the figure in Figuera´s patent

Regards

hanon

Quote from: hanon on November 25, 2014, 04:17:15 AM
Hi all,

Important video to watch and digest:

A user in the spanish forum (link) has uploaded a video with the induced coils placed perpendiculary to the inducer electromagnets and using like poles facing each other (N--induced--N) (repulsion mode). Powered with AC from the mains.

See the results: the input is not affected when adding a load in the induced circuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st254llePPs

Thank you very much to this user for noting this effect when testing his devices some time ago.

Regards

Does anyone try to replicate this important test ??  Please comment


~Maverick~

Quote from: hanon on November 27, 2014, 06:40:06 PM
This is the only file with Buforn´s patents. It is the original spanish text. There are not translations into english

http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/buforn.pdf

I have read them and all Buforn´s patent are exact copies one on the other and all are copies of the Figuera 1908 patent. You can see it just by comparing the figures in Buforn´s patents and the figure in Figuera´s patent

Regards

Thanks for the reply. My Spanish is not that good and I was able to fumble through some of it. Figuera patents aren't that long, Buforn's is over 100 pages. From what I was able to make out he starts taking about the energy from the sun and the magnetic field of the earth. I was hoping to save myself some time and maybe get a translated copy.

What I find strange in  both patents is that they state "....and this current that traverses a magnetic field originates the induced current" Taken from page 95 bottom paragraph. Here they are stating that the alternating current is traversing a magnetic field. Whats strange is "how does the current traverse a magnetic field?" If the alternating current is creating the magnetic field how can it also traverse it?

Its the age old question "What came first, the magnetic field that created the current or the current that created the magnetic field".

Anyway, I built a horseshoe electromagnet and added a closely spaced armature. On this armature I wrapped a heavy gauge coil. The electromagnets are about 800 turns of 22 gauge. Pulsed the magnets in series and parallel. The only interesting anomaly was that when I touched the armature with a ground wire I was able to create a heavy spark that jumped to the core on the horseshoe electromagnet. At one point I created a small flame that shot out from the air gap between the armature and the electromagnet.

This was short lived, after about 5 minutes the effect disappeared and I have not been able to manifest it again. The air gap between the armature and the horseshoe is a little thicker then a credit card.

I am in the process of revamping my rig to allow for a greater flexibility when it comes to experimenting. Like everyone else I dont have much time.

bajac

A quote found in the first column of the Cook's patent reads:

"The iron core A may be a solid bar or a bundle of iron wire, the latter giving higher tension to the current with equal length and fineness of wire."

Why is that?

Well, the laminated or bundle iron core decreases the magnitude of the Eddy currents induced in the iron core. But we only think of the Eddy current losses as an energy loss in the form of heat - Joules' losses. The truth is that the Eddy currents are created by the action of the primary magnetic field and as such they also must follow the effects of the Lenz's law. In other words, the Eddy currents in turn generate a reaction magnetic field that will tend to cancel the magnetic field that produces it in the first place. That is, another effect of the Eddy currents is to reduce the magnitude of the primary magnetic field.

Based on the above, do you understand now why Mr. Cook made that statement? Mr. Cook discovered the magnetic reduction created by the Eddy currents by experimentation. This magnetic loss is in addition to the magnetic hysteresis loss.

The effect on the primary magnetic field due to the Eddy currents is to reduce the magnetic field, which in turn reduces the induced voltage in the secondary coil resulting in a decrease of the KW generated by the device. It is not really a loss that affects the efficiency  but the output capacity of the transformer. It is interesting because I do not remember reading that information from our college or technical books, which relates the Eddy current losses to heat only.