Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[RandyFL]

Ramaswami,
In your guestimation ( if there is such a word ) is/was there air gaps in your apparatus ( the rods )...

There is no Logical mystery in Fiquera's transformers ( IMHO )...the larger the air gap - the less magnetism. The smaller the air gaps the larger the iron and more turns in the coils = greater magnetism - more output... / each to one's needs and expectations.............

hence... My opinion on size and amount of electricity is the same... ( I intend to stay small until I get the results I am looking for )...
My view of OU is keeping a 9 volt battery charged up whilest using 10 volts...

Lastly...I agree with Patrick - that all we have to do is lightly tap into ZPE ( zero point energy field ) and we will be rewarded...

All the best
Randy
ps keep moving forward or gravity will prevail :-)

[NRamaswami]

Randy:

In my case the air gap is the gap between the two primaries set to a feet length. shorter the distance greater the magnetic flux and hence the production in the center coil. I will need to try to give lower values and get lower outputs. I cannot rule out any thing and things can be learned only by practical hands on experimentation is my humble observation. Calculations do not work. That is another problem. Possibly it is due to my lack of theoretical knowledge.

I'm actually thinking of rebuilding the device and giving it to some testing lab so they can test it and certify what is the input and what is the output. We will do some time in the month of June after the vacations here in May are over.

[RandyFL]

Ramaswami,

Thinking about gaps in the conventional sense ( as I eat a bag of jelly beans )... two thoughts come to mind as I have looked at gaps on the internet... the bigger the gap the less magnetism...commercially made transformers use gaps like resistors...and/or the lessen the chance of saturation...which could lead to heat or possibly fire....

[a.king21]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vHhgYW3GDI


You should take a look at this.

[NRamaswami]

a.King21

Thanks for the link. I do not understand circuits and I'm not able to understand it. A similar old patent is GB191301908A of Roy Meyers. We cannot use permanent magnets to generate electricity like this. If they are heated they would lose their magnetism. This is why you do not see the commercial use of the table top devices that produce COP>1 results. The moment significant current is produced permanent magnets would be heated and then they would lose their magnetism.

I have tried the replication of Roy Meyers device and we felt that the electricity coming out is probably due to the fact that of the wires in the building. If we place it near some electrical wire or electrical appratus the output is higher and if we take it out to the terrace there was no electrical output. So we gave up. In the video it is seen a lot of turns are present and secondly it is near an electrical appratus even through it is not connected. So unless the device produces a lot of electricity that cannot be accounted for by the usage of electrical usage at the place where it is conducted we cannot be sure.

One academic friend who visited us even checked what is the distance between the nearest transformer and the device. He found it to be 300 feet away and only then he felt that isotopic changes might be taking place. Another Chemistry academic ridiculed that idea saying that it is easier to transmute one higher element to a lower element than to convert one isotope of one element to another sotope of the same element. Both of them would not allow me to name them. I personally do not know why and how the result is taking place. My simple understanding is that it is very easy to create a powerful magnet with rotating magnetic fields and when the opposite poles of two such electromagnets are used along with the normal way of using the lenz law abiding coiling type the output significantly increases. The transformer equations do not hold here and even lesser turns are able to produce higher output. That is also a big mystery to us.

As far as I can see the only clean unquestionable use of Permanent magnet motor that can work is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBRDvwrFwVo The person doing the experiment is correctly doing the unipolar magnetic motor and then use that rotation to rotate a normal alternator to generate power. This is some thing that can work. Magnets will not be heated. He is very clever. He claims to be from Pakistan but the emails to him went unanswered.

Permanent magnets are very dangerous and they will happilly jump at opposite poles and creating a magnetic shielding requires a lot of knowledge and effort but it can be done. It is another jinxed field. We had our accidents only when we tried this. I will not touch permanent magnets ever again.

One of my clients had a factory and did a lot of research of LENR devices and Permanent magnet motors and he has gone in to business ruin and poor health and sold away all assets. Another client built a self sustaining generator based on some principle that he refused to disclose but it had flywheels. I had advised him that if he does not disclose fully patent will not be granted. He refused to disclose and wanted to sell the idea to some one else for a very high fee. In one of his experiments the flywheel weighing 18 kgs broke loose and flew and hit him and moved away. The man was hospitalized for a few months.

The main reason why I open sourced my work rather than filing patents is to get out of this mess.  I have ensured that my efforts and knowledge are at least given as Knowledge to others and I have used this forum for that purpose.