Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

Quote from Figueras patent....It can be seen that electromagnet sets N and S operate in a complementary manner, because while the first set is being progressively powered up, the other set is being progressively powered down. This sequence is repeated continuously causing an orderly a constant variation of the magnetic fields passing through the induction circuit.
complementary manner......meaning N and S work together as in north south coil....

what Figueras is talking about is a set N and S NOT set of N and S.....meaning he is referring  an N and S as a set not necessarily the one next to it.

in such a way that the excitatory current will be magnetising successively with more or less strength, the first electromagnets, while, simultaneously decreasing or increasing the magnetisation in the second set, determining these variations in intensity of the magnetic field, the production of the current in the induced.
confirming again that the sets N and S are taken up then down in intensity.
again of my previous post where all the RED N and S sets are taken high then low,  the BLUE sets taken low then high varying the intensity of the currant  through INDUCTION !

RandyFL.....the core are ordered and will be here in three to four weeks. {4} 99.9 % Pure iron cores @ 2" x 4" x 2" depth.  2 Cores @ 2" x 2" cube.
10 awg square Magnet wire for output cores and 18 awg Magnet wire for electromagnets. timing circuit i have already designed from previous Figueras and the three phase transformer cores for mag amp i already have and are winding NOW......BOO YA !

RandyFL

MarathonMan
much success kiddo
where did you acquire the iron? and at what price...

marathonman

Ordered from over sea's supplier ....50$ cheaper per piece shipping included. as for the price.....em well i spent whole pay check on cores....Ouch ! whoops.... their goes an easy Grand.

RandyFL

Ouch...
I got mine from Ed Fagan Inc. at around 300.00 US ( which is not the best but it is adequate from tests I did )...
I also have the circuit that Patrick put on the website which is also adequate for this   

antijon

Well, marathonman, you certainly do get excited.

For those of you that are interested in what I have to say, there are evidences of why I believe this functions as an induction motor. For instance, the rotor of an induction motor is one coil winding. The strong current induced in the rotor is what generates the back voltage in the stator windings. In motor operation, this back voltage diminishes incoming current.

If we could tap the rotor windings, while the motor is running, we could add a load. However, a small load, like one lightbulb, would have an incredibly high resistance. This would lessen the rotor current which would lessen the back voltage in the stators, causing input current to increase. But, if we were to add a large load to the rotor, say 100 lightbuls in parallel (very low resistance), this would maintain the high current in the rotor, and maintain the stator back voltage.

Because of the power transfer theorem, we associate a drop in load resistance with a decrease in efficiency. In a normal generator, as load increases (or as resistance decreases to zero) efficiency is lost. However, it's the exact opposite with the induction motor's rotor. As the load decreases ( resistance increases), the efficiency decreases. A motor rotor is the only example of a device that increases efficiency as it is loaded.

This is why I believe the Figuera generator imitates an induction motor. As woopyjump showed in his videos, output load increases efficiency.

But this also introduces more complications. For back voltage to increase efficiency, it must have a path. This means that the driving circuit must allow the current to pass back to the source. If Figuera used a DC generator, or battery, to power his commutator, this is fine. But, if we use blocking diodes or transistors, we block most of the back voltage and won't see a drop in input current.

I'm going to try to work with this in mind.