Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Doug1]

Antijon
Since there are no stator coils represented in the picture of the motor generator it's pretty safe to assume they are permanent magnets. The housing of the motor closes the field between the magnets from behind them leaving it a north south configuration with the rotor between the poles. If it was going to be push push motor instead of push pull motor you would have to change a number of things.
  Speaking of push push, what happens to the collapsing magnetic field in a electromagnet? The field is supposed to give back current isnt it? Induction is any change in the field or movement of the conductor within a field. Long time ago I found my PMH after years of it being lost after it was charged up. It was still charged. It gave back all that was stored in it for all those years. I dont know of any battery that could have done that.

[hanon]

 It´s interesting that in Richard Willis patent WO2009065219A1 (Magnacoaster – Vorktex) he also used two lateral magnets with their north poles confronted. And a coil in between both magnets...I wonder if he was also using induction by flux cutting

[antijon]

Doug, the PMH is an interesting device. I'm sure modern science would say the cause is simply residual magnetism, which is true, but not really. It's obvious that a PMH holds a running magnetic field that must be unchanging over time. After all, if it was changing it would generate a current in the coils. Magnetic fields are mysterious themselves. If we observe Lenz law, we see that a North field, acting on a coil, can produce current in both directions, depending on if it's growing or receding. This is an interesting phenomenon, considering the polarity of a magnetic field. It almost looks like "magnetic particles" change direction in space.

Thanks for the info hanon, I'll look that up after work.

[marathonman]

It looks like Richard Willis is using the same technique as Mr Figueras did. using the second north pole collapse to assist the first one.
it has to be that either the particles change direction {probably not} or as you are Gaining/going in,  the front side of the spin is cutting the wire and when it is receding the back side of the spin is in cutting the wires causing reverse direction.

Found an interesting transformer from Germany.

[antijon]

I found a link to that patent here: http://diysome.web.fc2.com/FE/Hajime/Willis/WO2009065219A1.pdf

Sounds right to me. Didn't Figueras mention in a patent that his device was similar in principle to an induction coil? So perhaps his idea was to set-up an induced field in a coil, and then force the field to change? That would explain his 90 degree waveforms. 1st pulse to induce, and 2nd pulse to alter the induced field. 

I see in the Willis patent that he makes a point in mentioning that the lower magnet must be farther away. This means a couple of things, but one thing it brings to mind is that, in the Figueras, or with electromagnets, it may be necessary to have an air gap or space between the inducers and induced. This should allow the electromagnets to work on the induced field without affecting each other. But this may also be possible with spacing between the coils, on the same inductor shaft. Just thoughts. 

Does anyone know if this has been replicated?

Marathonman, I agree. I don't really think that there's a particle, it's just giving me a brain freeze. haha I mean, North increasing and South decreasing produce the same direction current... that could be explained by spin... 

About the transformer, I googled lenzless transformer and found variations of that design. Yar, but it's not lenzless. People are building it in circles, but it's not producing a revolving magnetic field, it's producing a magnetic field inline with the center coil. A definite pole face at the top and bottom of the loop. The reason why is that the side coils equally oppose the field of the center coil (inducing coil), and they equally oppose each other.

I did wire a transformer one time that looped two primaries together to kill the reactance, but I didn't record any output in my notes. All I can remember is that it produced a constant DC current in the primaries, even though it was powered by AC. The result was a whole lot of current draw. haha