Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[forest]

cliff33


How do you plan to use mosfets to amplify sinewave signal ? Of course you can simulate Figuera rotary "commutator" with a lot of mosfets but that's more complicated.

[cliff33]

Forest,

A 741 chip can be wired up to produce excellent sine waves.

[marathonman]

No sir i am saying Buforn saying 100 volt 1 amp in his patent as to spilling the beans, as in supplying it.

and no i mean using PNP's only, as in Mosfet's on the positive side only. if you use any kind of ic's on the negative side between the part G and the primaries you will loose all inductive kickback into the system. the declining electromagnet feeds the system from being shoved out of the primary.  the currant is being shoved into the system (Part G)  in the same direction as being fed.

part G is the most important part of the system. not only does it feed the system from stored magnetic energy from the declining electromagnet it regulates the currant in the form of reluctance from the winding's on it. not only that,  the field in part G is constantly rotating as the brush rotates so does the field and as the field is being fed from the declining electromagnet it is opposite from the inclining electromagnet being fed.

Doug is very smart and i would not be in the position i am in if it was not for him but he is not spilling all the beans as to say. sorry Doug ! most respect given.

Part G is the most important part in Figuera's system hand's down. everyone in this forum is guilty of completely overlooking part G it's not funny.
If one was to study part G one would find the key to happiness . 
imagine that !

Figuera's patent 1908 is DC fed only NOT AC.

[NRamaswami]

NRamaswami:

"High amperage comes only with high voltage."

There you go again with your total nonsense. My 12 volt 2000watt inverter takes 166 amps from my battery.
Never mind studying electronic theory, just stick with electrical!

Cliff33:

What is nonsensical talk? assuming electricity supplied by a battery to an inverter to be equal to an output from the secondary of CF devicee is certainly nonsensical.

Have you ever experimented with this type of  device? Have you ever constructed and checked the output? You do not even have the basic qualification of experimental experience to talk about me.

Let us see if you can generate 166 amps at 12 volts in a CF device as output from secondary.

If you cannot walk your talk just shut up and learn to listen to people who do real experiments and make observations.

I'm really tired of the fraudulent lies and misinformation being tomtomed here as if it is the truth. Make misrepresentation a thousand times and then many will believe it to be true seems to be the motto.

[Doug1]

Marathonman

"No sir i am saying Buforn saying 100 volt 1 amp in his patent as to spilling the beans, as in supplying it."

  lol and ya wonder how to scale the inducer coils or wind them or space them. Curious about it being slightly under voltage are ya? C'est la vie you'll figurea it out.