Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

ALVARO_CS

hello all
Stupify: I have been working last weeks with this subject, (Figuera), but not about the rotating field.
As I centered in the 1908 patent, in which the mag. fields are alligned, not rotating but rather fluctuacting from one side to the other (flip-floping ??)

IMHO the way to avoiding Lenz in the two series of inductors, is by means of the progressive addition of resistances after the commutator, (make before brake). So the input V never pases below 0 volts and therefore, no BEMF nor polarity reversal.In addittion, the air gap allows the collector to "produce" AC not influencing the inducing coils.
In my experiments, I reduced the number of resistors, and use a 12 pieces commutator, 3 resitors 100 ohms and 3 direct shunts (see schematic A).
Observed the following:
Spikes are produced at the brushes and also red light observable with one leg of neon bulb.
Variable DC Voltage at the collector higher than the input (after rectified & E. cap), but works with inductive loads, and not with resistive loads. (no amperage readdings yet).

I have been readding your posts very attentively, here and in the other forum, as well as the a.king21 ones.

I will give a try to this schematic you posted so will you be kind to help me with it ?

Is the toroid complete, or with 4 air gaps ?
Is it ferromagnetic ?, (I can make one with plastified iron wire,bailing wire)
Are the two primary winded over a secondary? if yes, should be these secondary in series as one coil ?
And lastly, what do think of using a commutator as B in the attached schematic ? I know that the ON will be longer that the OFF, but equal for both primary sets. It is moved by a small printer DC motor, so the rpm will be not so high (frequency)
thanks
cheers
Alvaro

stupify12

Quote from: ALVARO_CS on October 26, 2013, 01:49:24 PM
hello all
Stupify: I have been working last weeks with this subject, (Figuera), but not about the rotating field.
As I centered in the 1908 patent, in which the mag. fields are alligned, not rotating but rather fluctuacting from one side to the other (flip-floping ??)

I have been readding your posts very attentively, here and in the other forum, as well as the a.king21 ones.

I will give a try to this schematic you posted so will you be kind to help me with it ?

Is the toroid complete, or with 4 air gaps ?
Is it ferromagnetic ?, (I can make one with plastified iron wire,bailing wire)
Are the two primary winded over a secondary? if yes, should be these secondary in series as one coil ?
And lastly, what do think of using a commutator as B in the attached schematic ? I know that the ON will be longer that the OFF, but equal for both primary sets. It is moved by a small printer DC motor, so the rpm will be not so high (frequency)
thanks
cheers
Alvaro

The toroid is a complete ring no air gaps on this machine, no toroid splits on the annular ring..The magnetic flow on this machine never collide but moves like "catch me if u can"

Ferromagnetic=if you mean powdered iron,Tesla prefer soft iron which so many splits like a laminated. Ferromagnetic Powdered Iron is the best choice for the annular ring.

The primary is wounded first on the ring, The secondary is wound above the primary. Primary is first layer, Secondary is second layer but what ever how you wound the primary and secondary anything will work.. The patent on Tesla Toroid/Transformer shows how to wind the primary and secondary direction. All coils=primary and secondary wound started with CW. 
The secondary can be wired series or parallel it depens upon your choice, for there is also 4 wound coils of secondary on top of the Primary.

Any commutator will work. but you should put in mind the change of polarity on each Primary.

First, Lets say the COIL A is left=positive and right=negative.

Second:The next On is COIL B, Top=positive and Bottom=negative,
Third : The next ON Coil is COIL A in reverse polarity, Left=negative and Right=Positive.
Fourth: The next ON Coil is COIL B in reverse polarity, Top=negative and Bottom=positive.

Keep in mind that when the commutator is about to change to the next coil, There is a time that the BOTH COIL A and COIL B turns ON before it proceed to Another Quarter. Like the First Quarter and Second Quarter will ON Together before it proceed to Second Quarter.

First Quarter> First Quarter + Second Quarter> Second Quarter> Second Quarter+ Third Quarter> Third  Quarter>Third Quarter + Fouth Quarter> Fourth Quarter> Repeat from the beginning. ;D ;D

I think I have answered your question correctly. Good luck and Take care ::)

Meow ;D ;D

ALVARO_CS

Stupify
thanks for the detailed answer
I´ll have to diggest it slowly, and take my time.
I see that the polarity reversal is not possible with my present comm. setup.
will study how tesla did it. (I´m not skilled in electronics)

I understand the lenzless efect, but still do not catch where comes the excess of energy from a rotating mag field. I have got to see it with a working device, as my imagination has its limits !! :P

Alvaro

Doug1

Reversing the fields will never yield a self runner.Too much waste in fighting self induction, reluctance. Hannon you were on the right path in Reply #375.  Every stich of flux has to leave the induced from inducer in cyclic order. One is declining but in order for it to totally be evacuated the opposing has to push the remaining reminance completely back to where it came from. Any number of lines left behind will defeat the action by the same amount acting like a brake. The greatest amount of change in the induced in a stationary device can only be had by filling up with the magnetic flux then removing it completely. The only way to remove it totally is to have the opposite push out the remaining with another of the same which fortunately constitutes a 2nd pulse on the induced. If the window of activity is too small it will be a week effect and generate heat. The space for the induced will have to be adjusted to the effective working area of the inducers the measure of space where the fields can move back and forth based on the strengths of the inducers fields. Since you have decided to build by way of winging it. Your restricted in the physical size of your device because you placed the build of the cores before the desired output. Electromagnets are considerably stronger then perm magnets and the amount of voltage and current placed into an electromagnet may be far less then your imagining it should be.The amount of wire also makes a stronger magnet.
   You can also take into account some well documented facts about transformers. A trafo with no load other then to keep itself magnetized is 5 to 7 percent of the rated load output. For it to just sit there bouncing its field back and forth or round it;s core depending your point of view ,very little power is consumed. Until you place into the same magnetic path another coil that supplies a load with power. The same field is then threading both coils in a complete circle in a transformer ,the translation is one of a direct nature in a transformer.All the power must be supplied directly by the shared flux passing both coils. Avoid sharing and you avoid the drain on resources. Better still have two competing fields and the drain on resources is reduced with a greater output just like in the real world The only effect you need look for is the changing flux that resides in the induced. The ultimate load or work cares little how you changed the flux so long as it is changing. The more it changes the better so make the change a complete one. I believe the removal of the flux will be harder in the circular version.A inductive load may well be required to make it work but the news paper article mentioned he had a number of lights and a 20hp motor running in his home. The motor may have had some positive effect to counter the resistive load of the lights. I do not recall any mention to the motor actually being used to perform any task or work leading me to think it may have been an unloaded motor used to reinforce the timing in the induced circuit.

Schiko

@ Doug1
I agree with you!
Every explanation will end in simple voltage inverter optimized, not autorun device.  :(