Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[IMIGHTKNOW]

The Figuera device is not a violation of the laws of physics, it is just more efficient at converting and manipulating  energy in a much more efficient manner.
Resistance converts energy into heat which is very, very lossy and also nonrecoverable as much as we know. The use of an inductor would control the current flow and yet store and release energy. I have not tested yet but I would be hard pressed to find a more efficient way to control energy then with inductive reactance and an inductor. The losses associated with storing and releasing said energies have to be almost zero.

Hence the reason why Figuera chose it in the first place. 

[IMIGHTKNOW]

Over the years of collecting information on this device I have found that most of the people doing the screaming that it violates the conservation of energy have absolutely no clue how this device works. If you have no clue on how this device works then how on earth do you know it violates any such laws.
"YOU DON'T" or "THEY DON'T"
I would also even ponder the notion that they don't even know how a standard generator works. A generator produces it's own energy to feed the excitors. From the start of the turning to full on running conditions the generator powers it self. The secondary is looped back through the AVR at the tune of 10 to 15 % which is really small compared to the massive output.

The Lenz Law is the only obstacle I see as the deterrent to reaching self sustainment. If not for the repulsion and attraction of the rotor to the stator it would be self sustaining. The massive reverse torque placed on the rotor makes it a necessity to have a large motor to over come this Lenz Law force.

Removing the attractive and repulsive forces and you would have a generator that self sustains. This is exactly what Figuera did with his device and even went a step farther using an inductor to control the current flow with the added benefit of storing and releasing energy into the system. I think this made his device that much more efficient with the use of an inductor which in turn allowed a much smaller portion of the output to be fed back into the energizing system.

I think he is preserving the exciting potential with the inductor as well as using it to control current.

[SolarLab]

All,


Maybe you can take some good ideas from the link below:


https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/my-interpretation/


Note that in common moving generators the field electromagnets do not suffer any lenz effect (back emf) when rotating coils get in front of them. They do not increase its current consumption. The effect in generators is that moving parts suffer from dragging or cogging, but field electromagnets do not vary in consumption. This is the effect under Flux Cutting Induction.


Transformers on the other hand do suffer from back emf because they work with Flux Linking Induction.


If you may get a motionless generator, then the dragging effect should be avoided, because  if you only move the exciter fields, they are massless

Thanks Hanon - some excellent information. Considerable work and effort spent on it. 

The link was in the middle of my to-read list so it took a while to get to it and read through in detail.

Figuera shares a lot of similar "stuff" with the Holcomb HES LinGen I'm working on.

Appreciate all the research you've done over the years regarding this extremely interesting subject.

Have a good one!

SL

[BorisKrabow]

I can't stop my desire to turn Mike Corbin's device into a solid state generator    .

                               Coming soon somewhere in this section.......   



               Boris

[SolarLab]

I can't stop my desire to turn Mike Corbin's device into a solid state generator    .

                               Coming soon somewhere in this section.......   



               Boris

Hey Boris, That's the spririt - we're all behind you - if you need any help, don't hesitate!

Iligitimi Non Carborundum... 

SL