Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 28 Guests are viewing this topic.

floodrod

Next question:

Notice how all the electromagnet drawings either show no core /  or partial core?  No drawings show cores going fully through the electromagnets.  Seems like the depicted cores only interface with 1 pole of the electromagnet.

Can we assume we do NOT want the 2 unused poles of the electromagnets to have a good magnetic path between them? 


Cadman

Floodrod, assume nothing. Figuera and Buforn patents show both ways.

Regarding Hanon's research,
If you pay attention to what Hanon presents at his web site, he is correct about the same polarity opposing. What is not correct is the depiction of the exciters fluctuating from minimum to maximum. We all fell for this, even though the patent warned us the drawing was only an example for the principle.

Think about it. Hanon's drawings show the two fields moving left to right alternating from Max to Min and backs it up with the video showing the better results with opposing magnets.
But the video uses movement of the coil which negates the patent claims.

In the video the strength of the magnets at each end never varies. That's the important take away, the exciter fields must not diminish in strength. Reducing one field will not keep the magnetic compression between the exciter fields. You have to keep the strength and compression while moving the exciter fields relative to the induced to duplicate the results in Hanon's video.




IMIGHTKNOW

Quote from: Cadman on March 27, 2023, 09:14:03 AM
Floodrod, assume nothing. Figuera and Buforn patents show both ways.

Regarding Hanon's research,
If you pay attention to what Hanon presents at his web site, he is correct about the same polarity opposing. What is not correct is the depiction of the exciters fluctuating from minimum to maximum. We all fell for this, even though the patent warned us the drawing was only an example for the principle.

Think about it. Hanon's drawings show the two fields moving left to right alternating from Max to Min and backs it up with the video showing the better results with opposing magnets.
But the video uses movement of the coil which negates the patent claims.

In the video the strength of the magnets at each end never varies. That's the important take away, the exciter fields must not diminish in strength. Reducing one field will not keep the magnetic compression between the exciter fields. You have to keep the strength and compression while moving the exciter fields relative to the induced to duplicate the results in Hanon's video.

You have a contradiction from one sentence to another.  "What is not correct is the depiction of the exciters fluctuating from minimum to maximum" then you go on to say "the two fields moving left to right alternating from Max to Min."

It is the same thing, two electromagnets are compressing the magnetic field lines then sweeping back and forth. This is done by raising and lowering both at the same time which is still a minimum to maximum of each electromagnet opposite yet in unison.

PS. The bar in the middle looks like some kind of reinforcement of some kind as it looks to be on top of the cores. The core will have a lot of force on them during the switching which mean they will need to be secured in some way.
Any thoughts?

madddann

Quote from: Cadman on March 27, 2023, 12:57:37 PM
This is what I mean

Hi all.
Nice idea Cadman, did you try it out yet? Maybe compare hanon's version vs yours...
Finally a path forward, THX.

Dann