Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 73 Guests are viewing this topic.

Newton II

It is correct that when you provide air gap between cores, it causes addition of fluxes produced by all three solenoids. But when you provide air gap between solenoids, the fluxes produced by solenoids will not flow as freely as when without air gap because iron being a very strong magnetic material holds the flux within itslef and will not allow the flux to pass through the air gap and reach the next core.  To compensate for this you have to pass a very strong current through primary producing stronger flux. ( somewhere NRS has mentioned that 'higher the voltage higher will be output'. Higher voltage will cause higher current depending on power availability producing stronger flux).

If you want to make it self-running,  the number of turns in secondary should be corresponding to the current required by primary.  So you have to correctly design the core, number of turns in primary and secondary with suitable air gap.  If not you may have to do several 'trial and errors'  before you end up with something interesting.

Just by meddling with few wires and iron rods you cannot make a working device.


NRamaswami

Hi Newton II:

I think there is a miscommunication here. What do you mean by air gap?

By air cap I meant that there is an air cap between the outer plastic tubes on which we wound wires. Iron rods are continuous. Same rod may go between two different solenoids. There is no air gap between iron rods but between the plastic tubes that are P1,S and P2. We simply dumb the rods and then hammer them to be very tightly fit. There may be air gaps between rods but not exactly at the points you mention..It is not built like that..You see iron rods are cut to 17 inches. Plastic tubes are cut to 18 inches and then we ensure that no air gap between iron rods are present as that creates a lot of noise. If all iron rods are very tightly packed the noise is reduced. In that respect there is no air gap between in the iron core in the junctions of P1,S and P2. Air gap exists between the plastic tubes for they are cut tubes.


And we cannot have two iron rods with opposite poles standing with air gaps. Against common sense. Magnets with opposite poles with be attracted to each other and stick to each other. Whether they are permanent magnets or electromagnets..



NRamaswami

Hi Newton II:

When you say self running... Do you mean to say that we must provide exact wattage consumed by the primary back to the primary for it to self run or in exact voltage:amperage combination apart from exact wattage.. For example if I provide the feedback from a lower voltage and higher amperage but similar wattage as feedback from thick wires,  would it become higher voltage lower amperage combination automatically due to the fact that the primary has thinner and so higher resistance wires..Can you clarify on this point please.. I'm obliged..

forest

You can find some information about Steven Mark TPU here : http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Steve_Marks_Toroid_Generator Nobody knows the details , like for many OU devices, but Steven MArk has given enough information to realize that it is a self-running ,self-feeding device composed of coils alone.The control coils are there to limit the output voltage as in other case it will immediately vaporise due to extensive power runaway. I found in one newspaper about Hubbard description of a wires wound around the device, maybe for the same purpose (to contradict runaway action by magnetic field resistance?) All that is not much important as it is only my intuition...


Can you clarify that you have 3 separate coils each of his own PVC tube ? How they are connected , glued together ? Previosuly I thought that it was all on one single PVC tube with 3 cores inside.

NRamaswami

Hi:

What you call as steven Mark coil is MOLINA-MARTINEZ, Alberto coil.. It is nothing but a Hubbard coil. No patent granted for it  for it is a violation of Law of Conservation of Energy. No Steven Mark coil but it is a MOLINA-MARTINEZ coil..Patent was obviously refused. This is nothing but a three phase Figuera device. In fact the Figuera device itself could be three phase but because I do not understand Electrical Engineering and three phase, I made it a single phase one. The output I recorded is correct from the information on this coil. All videos have disappeared but I located the patents. They are based on the way the Earth works. It is a 24 coil Hubbard coil rather than a 8 outer coil Hubbard coil..Your description of runaway control is wrong but it does it differently.