Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[alan]

An idea for Floodrod:   
Take a big squarely wound coil, and two exciter coils, position these 2 vertically, put the square coil on top with a side on each face of an exciter coil, now excite the left with N and the right one with S (and any combination you want to try out).  Or try to excite from the sides like Floyd Sweet did. 

To give you an idea  (repost): 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWcPcOg_yc0 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3Enr6_d3yU 

The counter reaction of flux linking is back-mmf and -emf, which satisfies conservation of energy. With a dynamo or alternator motional induction is used, which is completely different from flux linking, and it is back-torque to fulfills the energy balance. 
These inventions create motional induction of perpendicular action VxB with zero flux-linking, and zero movement, the action is perpendicular according to Lorentz law qVxB, the movement is emulated, and the counter reaction of back-torque doesn't enforce the energy balance because it doesn't move.
Don't look for efficiency, engineers are doing that in the last 1% but they will never exceed 99.9%, look for the effect.

[floodrod]

Thanks Maddmann-  I viewed the patent but can't clearly make out the coil arrangements.  I don't mind trying things, and yes I have many dozens of coil styles to play with. But I would need a clearer diagram of the coil arrangement to duplicate.

SL- Can you show which Figuera image has a completed path?  They all look incomplete to me, even the 1908. I agree tho that we probably didn't receive the correct complete coil arrangement.

[gyvulys666]

It seems output coils are perpendecular to input coils.Looks like that each output coil has inside electromagnet which windings are perpendecular and each output coil surounded by perpendecular electromagnets. And all this 7 input electromagnet switched on/off at the same time

[citfta]

Floodrod,


You have done an amazing amount of work and research.  Your system for getting both phases above zero is great.  However I think you have missed a couple of things that you need to get your output up.


Your coil arrangement needs to be as follows:  Input phase A, output, input phase B, output, input phase A, output , input phase B and so on for as many coils as you want.  But you need an input coil on each end of your assembly.  In other words each output coil needs an input on both sides of it.  And as SL said if you put a clamp or some other way to complete the magnetic circuit that would also help.


And the other thing you need to do is test with your output coils loaded.  As you have correctly posted several times you want the reducing phase to be pushed back by the increasing phase.  Since the phases are separated by the input coil the only way for this to happen is for the output coil to have current flowing through it.  In one of your videos you actually showed the input go down slightly when the output is shorted.  So load the output and then adjust the frequency and any other adjustments and see what you get.


Respectfully,
Carroll

[alan]

It seems output coils are perpendecular to input coils.Looks like that each output coil has inside electromagnet which windings are perpendecular and each output coil surounded by perpendecular electromagnets. And all this 7 input electromagnet switched on/off at the same time

Yeah, exactly. The flux is going through the wire wraps inducing current by the Lorentz force of motion, perpendicularly, it's not going through the inside of the coil parallel to the axis