Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[aleks]

AC discharge into the carbon rod.

What does that mean? What is AC discharge? AC is a continous alternating current, it is not a discharge.

[Feynman]

see previous thread page for more details


@sulake

Okay , let me apologize first, because I have a habit of not speaking clearly and just assuming I make sense when I am actually being unclear.  I also sometimes exaggerate to make a point. 

1) I am not saying there is a 'minimum' voltage at which the reaction will not occur. Some atoms will enter reaction even at 35V.  Rather what I am saying rather we think we are dealing with a graph that will be a peak voltage where you have the highest number of atoms entering into this Synergetic/NMR reaction or whatever the heck it actually turns out to be.  The graph is exponential then logarithmic. We think this peak voltage is probably going to be triple digits, but of course we may be proved wrong by experiments.   




2) We believe Naudin may have been fooled by his results.  That is, he was using a current transformer.  The currents he measured may have been an illusion caused by his setup.  So yes, his extremely high currents may be true,  but they also may be an illusion caused by the transformer he was using.  We need to keep both possiblities in mind and not take Naudin's results as dogma, although I do think they are very useful.

3) I agree we need high current during the primary discharge.  Dr. R has calculated we need this large number of electrons for the reaction to enter 'saturation'.  I personally do not understand the details of this, but R came out with a figure of approximately 300 amps to make sure we are saturating the carbon to ensure the collapse of enough L orbitals and NMR 'events', or whatever you'd like to call them.  (in our evolving theoretical understanding anyway).  We have gotten nowhere near this number (300A) as this sort of current requires IGBTs, drivers, and PWM circuits with low duty cycle (like 1%-50%).

4) Spark gap is not necessary, it has been proved by our experiments. It makes no change we could detect with our equipment. Of course people should replicate this result.

Thanks again for your input sulake

Feynman

PS Please please be careful with runaway.  It is not a theoretical possibility but an experimental fact.

[Feynman]

When I say AC 'discharge' I just mean simply whatever is coming out of an battery/inverter/transformer combo (output connected to the carbon), so yes you are correct it is continuous AC which which we input to the rod and not a sporadic discharge.

However, as I said it works with both AC input to the rod as well as pulsed DC input to the rod.  Regardless, if you are using using a toroidal collector you will get AC out on the secondary ('collector') at the same frequency at which your voltage it enters the primary ('carbon rod').

[aleks]

When I say AC 'discharge' I just mean simply whatever is coming out of an battery/inverter/transformer combo.

OK, but are you using gate or is it really a plain sinusoidal AC input, without any circuit breaking moments?

[hartiberlin]

So I changed now the graphics to this version: