Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[tagor]

see also

SWOT analysis of STEM-physics
As for any new initiative, it is wise to analyse the many aspects that the processes of promoting, advocating, experiencing and developing this new theory can involve.

The SWOT analysis, which consists in formalizing any Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threaten, brings a complete sight over Synergetics' ideas.
It is thus a good way for introducing STEM-physics.


SWOT analysis of STEM-physics
Strengths
STEM-physics provides an interpretation to the main results of physics in which the incoherent space-time distortions are clearly discarded.

STEM-physics reconciles the quantum-wave dualism.

STEM-physics extends the quantum theory by explaining the deep nature of space, energy and matter.

STEM-physics demonstrates how space embeds a great amount of energy.

STEM-physics explains cold fusion and how to obtain a positive energy balance from neutrinos involved in K capture.

STEM-physics could certainly stem new discoveries in physics.

STEM-physics opens tremendous new perspectives in many other sciences.

Weaknesses
STEM-physics directly refutes the so-called proven theory of relativity, which is dogmatically adopted by official physics.

STEM-physics has long been the only work of its lonely author with poor communication means.

STEM-physics still needs an easy-to-realize experiment in order to evidence positive energy balance.

A mathematical model of STEM-physics is still not enough developed.

Opportunities
STEM-physics isn't a guru's theory. It needs team involvement to be developed.

STEM-physics' model certainly explains not everything and the team is strongly recruiting in order to pursue developments.

STEM-physics can be developed as an extent of quantum theory, a sort of general theory of fields that would have been get rid of relativity.

STEM-physics can help to develop emerging industries in order to serve the poorest peoples: water supply, small autonomous electrical generators, low-cost heaters and coolers...

Threatens
Any monopole of energy, held by governments and industry, has no lean to promote STEM-physics which explains how space energy could be harnessed.

The acceptance of STEM-physics implies some officials to face their errors; they will consequently fight against the new idea.

STEM-physics has great chance to be rapidly ranked as a crank theory in order to avoid that it disturbs official stances.

this words comes  from F Vallee ( RL Vallee's son )


http://franckvallee.free.fr/localhost/plain/overview/introduction/faq.html

[aleks]

It's just a surrounding sphere of metal which collects a negative charge from the beta particles. I almost burst out laughing when I was reading the patent, like "is this it??" .

Well, sphere or cylinder collect charge, they become positively charged. In the end this generates electrostatic energy which is saturatable: a given piece of metal won't charge more than some fundamental space charge laws allow it to charge. Hence, it is inefficient. I think we should strive to use EM energies and displacement currents that are produced by beta electrons. In this case spheres and cylinders are unusable.

[Feynman]

I could have sworn the patent said the sphere collects a negative charge (as it gets hit with beta rays), because they show it has an optional ground connection on the collector sphere. 

Yes you are right, they do mention saturation after which beta rays are deflected from the surrounding collector (and an upper limit on absorbable charge).  So this is not an optimum setup, but it is notable because it was the earliest patent I could find on betavoltaics.

[aleks]

I could have sworn the patent said the sphere collects a negative charge (as it gets hit with beta rays)

Yep, could be. If number of electrons rises, it's a negative charge rising. But in reality + can always be changed to -, so I'm mixing these things from time to time.

[tagor]

this is from Eric d'Hoker ( belgium)




but , since 30 years  nobody could reproduce this !!
but you can do it