Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

zerotensor

Quote from: Elisha on June 02, 2008, 10:40:43 PM
This is the equipment needed for make the testing. (my opinion best functionality at lower price)

...

Total bugget until now, 680 $

*druel*

Um, anybody have 700 bucks they can give me?  I'll do some really good tests-- I promise!

But really, one of the things about this system is that you really don't need all that fancy equipment to do these experiments ('though it would be sweet).  Here's my shopping list:

Carbon electrodes:  $2, internet
SCR, transistors, etc:  ~$50, Digikey or wherever.
Everything else:  $0, dumpster-dive / scavenge.

While I admit that nice f'n gens and scopes would make the design / testing process easier, one should be able to build the device for under $100.

Showing OU would be as easy as closing the loop and running a load without an external power supply.

(I know, easier said than done...)

AbbaRue

In my hurry to get to work earlier, I forgot to mention one very important point.
To have a self running unit I want to turn the mosfets off as soon as possible so the
feedback pulse from the toroid doesn't get shorted out across the discharged capacitor bank.
I want the whole pulse current entering the carbon rod.

Time to do some testing now, and hopefully the next time I post on this forum I will have some test results to share.
So it might be a few days till you hear from me again.

@Elisha
Good stuff, I was considering getting one of those USB port oscilloscopes myself at one time.
I could use it now. 

Till later happy experimenting, Harold.

Elisha

The oscilloscope is to make a more formal, more scientific approach, if this circuit work for overunity then we need to duplicate the circuit for validate, this is essence of the scientific method.

If someone find something then someone else must to corroborate the result. That is the scientific way.

We need the oscilloscope, we need to make multiple test, and fill tables and graphics with the test data.

We have to get organization in our investigation, the money is limited, the time is limited.

If someone have a working overunity circuit please post a photo, describe the circuit, explain the test.

The single shoot circuit is the better first step, we can test the voltage for the caps, the position of the toroid for best alignment field, the size of the carbon rod, the position of the neomagnet.

Then we can work in the self running circuit.  This baby need first learn to walk then run.

@Abbarue
I also thing that is something like the pulsed laser

The battery have the lot of amper needed, but I think that dont work in the speed of discharge needed, the capacitor also have speed of discharge.

@allcanadian
Please post some photos of your circuit.
@UncleFester
Please post some photos of your circuit.

k4zep

Quote from: UncleFester on June 02, 2008, 12:22:57 AM
The issue is not setting up a single pulse, this has already been done. The required input according to Juan is 109-110 joules. This entire charge is discharged across the carbon rod at a steady pulse rate (in this case 50 or 60Hz depending on the frequency of AC required). This requires large transistors in the 500 volt @ 100 to 300 ampere range with large heatsinks. If you want to do the single pulse setup just use a momentary switch to fire the 555 and thus fire the gates of IGBT or Mosfet. Of course alignment field is needed as well which can be run from the same 555 output to run the gate of a separate transistor running the alignment field coil....

Hi Uncle Fester,

Several folk have been watching this thread and there is serious testing going on off this list.  No sense talking about it unless absolutely positive results.  I personally would not mind a hand drawn schematic from you, saves time and effort and gets the point across very fast.  My friends and I have all the equipment to build/test this device. 

From what I see so far, the engineering mountains to overcome are pulse current into and then current out of the device.  I so far have EMR pulse problems that really mucks with solid state instruments.  Shorts in the Toroid due to flash over when rod fires, HV supply Caps. that break down in a rapid fire pulse mode. High voltage/current IGBT's that roll over and die on command.   It's not as easy as it would first appear to be. 

Can you use a high current bidirectional sine wave through the rod/reactor or do you find that there is a need for a rapid rise time mono polarity pulse in the rod for maximum output? 


Respectfully
Ben K4ZEP

twosox

phew, read that post just in time, components placed on the board and my soldering iron was about to get plugged in.  :o

ordered a sack load of 555's today just on the off chance a suitable circuit popped up, thanks Abbarue,
is your circuit on veroboard, breadboard or have you etched your own?