Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[mikewatson]

One method that does seem to give overunity is Naudin's so called plasma cold fusion. I used a graphite rod (negative) and stainless steel sheet (positive) in potassium chloride solution in a 500 ml lab beaker. The carbon glows white hot in the water with brilliant flashing white sparks on the surface. Weighing the water before and after and the voltage and current input there seems to be overunity. Naudin gives the full calculation:-
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/ape/index.htm
The graphite rod is also pitted even after only a two minute run.

Mike

[sparks]

NDA?

Nothing that breakable 

The only thing I ever saw that looked almost exactly like one... There are two of them in the middle of the big TPU. They appear to be the same size also. The idea of any experimenter getting their hands on a small betatron is ridiculous.

I think there is a good reason for limited information on these.

BTW: The charge rotational axis was as most would expect but the magnetic axis was 90 out (as I'm sure you would expect) and now that there have been many years for me to think about it the latter should have also rotated again around the charge axis.

See why I would give my mother-in-law for one?

  Bep

     Those white deals look like a magnetron core to me.  Radar.  SM  could have himself a big old unloaded microwave oven.  The torroid windings and capacitors just low frequency lc tanks. And the collector winding collecting standing waves.
The difference here is that you produce a rotating pulsed magnetic field to work the torroid lctanks.  If this rotating magnetic field takes advantage of the Earth's magnetic field relativity to it's spin then there is gain from Earth's rotation.
   Sorry again for this off topic intrusion.

[mikewatson]

Carbon to iron transmutation.
Continuing my last posting regarding plasma electrolysis with a graphite rod, I remembered Joe Champion and Michio Kushi's low energy transmutation experiments. They claimed that arcing carbon under water transmutes it to iron. The configuration with plasma electroysis is slightly different but nevertheless a mass of brown particles have sunk to the bottom of the beaker I used. Holding a neo magnet underneath showed strong magnetic attraction on some particles suggesting they are ferromagnetic. The stainless steel counter electrode is not attacked at all so the ferromagnetic particles must have come from the graphite rod I used. However it is spectrally pure graphite. The potassium chloride electrolyte is reagent grade and the water distilled so I conclude that Champion & Co are right carbon (graphite) has transmuted to iron.

Mike

[forest]

Caron into iron , hmmm...

I thought how it is possible and invented very odd theory. What if electrons may lost spin , fall into core and become proton or neutron ?  Spin will radiate and being heat light or other radiant energy wave.
If this is possible someone should analyse old arc lamps.

[Koen1]

@Mike: yeah, I've heard quite a number of accounts of
underwater discharge systems accumulating a brown
muck at the bottom (or at the electrodes) and/or
brownish 'spume' on top of the water... I seem to recall
most of those did use carbon (graphite) rod electrodes.

@Forest: well, yeah, exotic electron+proton=>neutron
fusion could explain it I guess... But that is not really
considered to be a common reaction...
I would guesstimate it is due to absorption of neutrons
from the water. Possibly even absorption of multiple
protons and neutrons. After all, if the water contains
deuterium, deuterium-hydrogen nuclear fusion may occur
(if the fields and energies are right), which as we all
know should produce a nucleus with 2 protons and 1 neutron,
which is a Helium nucleus a.k.a. alpha particle.
But I must admit it is quite a large jump to get from Carbon
to Iron: Carbon has 6 protons and 6 neutrons (98.9% of it does,
1.1% of it has 7 neutrons but is still stable, only trace amounts
just above 0% are unstable C14 with 8 neutrons and decays into
Nitrogen14 after a near 6000 year halflife) while Iron has 26
protons and 30 neutrons (91.7% of it does, while theoretically
any range between 28 and 34 neutrons will still form Iron,
of which only Fe57 and Fe58 (with 31 resp 32 neutrons) is
stable along with Fe56. All the others decay, although Fe54
with 28 neutrons has a halflife of approx. 3000 billion billion years,
if I'm not mistaken. So it's not stable but I wouldn't really call
it very instable either.

In any case, my point is: to get from 6 protons and 6 neutrons
to 26 protons and 30 neutrons, we'd clearly need to add another
20 protons and another 24 neutrons... And if we'd need to get
all those from Deuterium and Tritium, we'd need something like
16 Deuterium atoms and 8 Tritium atoms, which would give us
16 proton+neutron pairs and 8 neutron-proton-neutron triplets,
resulting in the necessary 20 p and 24 n.
That's a hell of a lot of heavy water getting cemented together
into one iron atom!
Seems highly unlikely...
Let's assume 4 carbon nuclei can join the fusion dance...
then we'd already have 24 protons and neutrons, and we'd only need
2 more protons and 6 more neutrons...

Sigh... Well, IDK.
But it sure looks like it can't just be the water providing those huge amounts
of neutrons... Or you'd have some damn heavy water running from your taps!