Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[midnight_blue]

? erfinder Reply #191 on: March 20, 2007, 08:43:52 PM
As I stated earlier there are many question erfinder posed without answers. Here are some regarding magnetism.
What causes the field lines of a permanent magnet to expand outward?

Why is the point of maximum expansion of the field lines at the equator?

How does the flux enter and exit the permanent magnet?

What is the difference between a man made permanent magnet and those constructed by nature?

What is the nature of a flux line?

If you can answer these questions right now you are one step closer to understanding some of the freaky stuff I have presented here.  The majority of researchers here are as I was in my beginnings blinded by the quest for free energy. 

I?ll take a stab at What is the nature of a flux line?
Is where magnetism changes to electricity in the flux lines wall. This wall has ionized charges on the outside and magnetism on the inside.

My opinion is this, think 2 springs, vortex shaped back to back.  First contraction occurs squeezing the 2 springs together. Then when they have reached the point that they cannot be contracted further they expand creating the flux lines. As erfinder said this happens in one fluid motion.

Contraction = centripetal
Expansion = centrrifugal
The VOID!

Why do I think this is so important. The following should answer that question.

From http://www.vortexscience.com/magnetism.php
?Both the magnetic field and electricity are dynamic systems. But the electrostatic charge is a static system. When a dynamic system is saturated with a static system, extraordinary things happen.?

Regards,
Midnight

[allcanadian]

From http://www.vortexscience.com/magnetism.php
ââ,¬Å"Both the magnetic field and electricity are dynamic systems. But the electrostatic charge is a static system. When a dynamic system is saturated with a static system, extraordinary things happen.ââ,¬Â

This is what I have been trying to tell you for the last 8 posts!
I must not be making this clear enough, so I will start with something easy, so pay attention.
Victor schaubergers technology IS electrostatic, He uses a vortex to spin a column of geospheric media(water and air). What are you and everyone else missing about his machines? He uses diamagnetic catalysts(copper) to negatively supercharge the moving  air/water with negative electrostatic charge------- the opposite of what we do today-------not positive but negative. He stated he could produce an electrostatic field of 2 Million volts from one drop of water!
So here we have a dynamic system (tripolar masses having magnetic fields) moving at an ever increasing speed in the vortex and saturated in negative electrostatic charge, producing a huge diamagnetic field.
The magic is MOVING A STATIC FIELD! an electrostatic field that's it.

-Move a magnetic field (pulse) it with a changing electrostatic field.
-Have a media(air/water) staurated in electrostatic charges move.
-Accelerate an electric EM field by having the electrostatic move intermitently.

[midnight_blue]

@allcanadian,

I have been following your posts with great interest. It was not I that flamed your ideas, on the contrary, I happen to agree with most of what you say. I know you had stated the link previously as I had also. But this link is on erfinders web page. One which he wants us to study. Though I have a much better understanding of magnetism after reading that page, I still have some questions, and thought that collectively as a group we discuss it here. Some have already dismissed your posts as too complex and we need to keep it simple, I for one am searching for truths. If the debate happens that this indeed is the wrong path then so be it, we move on to the next subject. If its of any consolation I believe you are on the right track. I meant no offense to you. I was paying attention ;-)

Regards,
Midnight

[samebarbosi]

I will just assume everyone knows what BEMF is (if not google for it, wiki for it...).
This occurs when in primaries field collapses.

Apply this principle to a Tesla coil. What a Tesla coil produces? Electrostatic charge. With no load is there any discharge (sparks = discharge, waste, we don't want waste, so you say no)? Could this then be represented as a capacitor?
Many secondaries of Tesla coils (say... 6) having each its charge when you put them in series, how much charge do you have from all?

Looking at the patent drawing for the G coils consider them for a moment the second secondaries of each Tesla coil. Do they have their own charge? what sign compared to the previous one? You put together those secondaries with the "sweet spot", then whatever remains connect to capacitor. What will be the charge of capacitor?

This was phase one.

Phase two. The field in primaries collapses again and the same happens but with different sign. The HV charge stored previously in capacitor has to be replaced with the new one (with different sign again).

Now comes into play the vortex scenario. Just figure how one charge will be pumped to its plate, while the old one is sucked to the other plate. All this in the same pipe. See it? Now use decent words such as explosion, implosion etc. and you're done. At least for now.

Phase three: go to phase two...

This is the big picture I see. Other details related to Erfinder's questions and statements, if you want answers, just think. With this simple principle you can judge by yourself.

As I said, my mistake was to think to all previous posts but it was enough to trust Erfinder and to focus only to 646666.

I hope it helps. No more spoon feeding 

[bocas]

Barbosi:
  In phase 1 there are six charged inductors in series, connected to each side of the capacitor on one end and the "sweet spot" on the other.  The voltage potential on each inductor adds like batteries in series.  If each inductor has 500 volts across it there will be 3000 volts on each side of the capacitor which puts 6000 volts across it.