Why we still don't have free energy the real reason

[profitis]

true to a degree @skywalker.however ive noticed alot of establishment scientists themselves are now prodding into 'forbidden' territory even in published journals.not that they are actively seeking to bend rules but rather that they are crossing paths with findings which contradict the rules.they are poking the tip of the iceberg so-to-speak without being rude to the rules of engagement.     

[Pirate88179]

@Webby,
Attached is a photo of my installation. I show this to make the point that safety need not be sacrificed with the proper engineering. Atomizing injectors are not vaporizers but injectors can be made to vaporize first, before injection. This is not done because of the obvious benefits to us, ie., cleaner, more efficient burn and much higher MPG. These are not money makers for either the car mfg.'s or for big oil but do benefit most everyone elses wallet. This iteration is only the beginning and will only get more safety aspects when people understand what the cost benefit really is and how it really works.

Cas:

No offense intended but, I have to say that this looks like an engine fire just looking for a place to happen.  Seriously, be careful.  That set-up does not look like it will survive the vibrations and heat degradation we see under the hoods of the modern auto these days.

Bill

[LibreEnergia]

cumon people cumon.its expressly forbidden for any device to produce useful work when there is no temperature difference right?well what the hell is a nantenna doing then?a nantenna rectifying ambient infrared doesnt need a temperature difference.it cuts us some dc current and voltage in the face of the 2nd law thermodynamics! If this isnt perpetual motion on display i dont know what is.even the wikipaedia article on nantennas admits its confusion to this issue.

nantennas do not violate 2LOT. The 'confusion' in the Wikipedia article is entirely due to the author being diplomatic with the wording. In another forum (http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/38106/does-nantenna-nano-antenna-violates-2nd-law-of-thermodynamics) he says as much and says,

"What I wanted to say was: "Obviously this application would violate the second law of thermodynamics." But I ended up writing that more understated and diplomatic sentence which you quote, because of wikipedia's referencing rules. "

[profitis]

@libre..i have to vehemently disagree,if your nantenna is rectifying ambient infrared then you have basicly got a phil hardcastle device in action,ie.a mim diode rectifying without need for temperature gradient.same applies to my earlier parabolic mirror example,zero point-light source required,inside the box.