New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[TinselKoala]

Oh come on MH..... when did you ever see a more profound textbook case of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome?

The electrical and thermal power issues have been settled long ago. The Quantum-17 circuit was replicated according to Ainslie's instructions, with and without the 555 timer, with and without the inverted duty cycle, with FGs and no FGs, by literally dozens of people, including such greats as Aaron Murakami and Dr Stiffler. And FuzzyTomCat, Harvey, and of course Little Old Me. Many of us did really good calorimetry. Nobody confirmed Ainslie's wild claims.

So the real matter of interest now, and for some time since,  is the psychological one. Ainslie has apparently got her own little cult going! Not even Donovan Martin can break free of her clutches and talk, independently and rationally, about the history and the present situation. We see Ainslie, the cult leader, descending further and further into decompensation after her recent public humiliation and the forced withdrawal of her two daft manuscripts. She magically conjures "accreditations" from people and agencies who apparently never heard of her, and then claims that her statements constitute actual notifications from those agencies and persons themselves! This is deeper than a delusion, it's very nearly an hallucination.

So MH you've got to put on another hat! The EE and physics issues are moot, they just provide a backdrop and props for the real drama, which is psychological. Look at it like a Tennessee Williams play or something, or a bad opera, with a scrawny wench parrot squawking instead of a fat mezzo-soprano singing. And she hasn't squawked her last, yet.

"Stella! Oh STELLA!"

--TK


@Brine Shrimp: Koalas are not bears, and we are not cuddly at all, so don't try to pet one of us, you might draw back a bloody shredded stump.

[SeaMonkey]

@Brine Shrimp: Koalas are not bears, and we are not cuddly at all, so don't try to pet one of us, you might draw back a bloody shredded stump.

I rest my case!

Surely it must have been a typo,

Happy Hyperbole!

[MileHigh]

Yes at times one can be brazen and state the facts.  There is a limit to one's restraint.   In order to make a point when dealing with crazy situations like this one, and considering all that has transpired over the course of several years, being brazen makes sense.  We all know who the 'bad guy' is pertaining to the fundamental issue of respect for the qualifications of the people that you are dealing with.  It was a cheap shot and you have been making it for years, you bitch.  Plus, with the Dollard affair, some schmuck posted Aaron's address, email address, and phone number.  So you can kiss my ass Rosie Posie, I am not going to reveal my identity and risk getting attacked on the street by a mentally imbalanced person.  I would never dare dream to ask anyone online to do that.  This is a covenant that we all share online and it goes back to the BBS days, you fool.

Many of us know that the 2002 circuit is meaningless and worth no more than a 10 minute discussion in an Electronics 101 class.  The real discussion would be about the MOSFET itself.

The opportunity cost associated with this affair is astronomical at this point in time.

[MileHigh]

Hopefully my final comment about this and then I will just observe.

<<< Sadly there was a brutal consequence to their involvement.  ALL three of the players at ABB Research - were retrenched, put on early retirement and sacked - respectively - within 3 months of that publication.  I then learned better than to reference any of the names in those reports that come out in support of over unity evidence.  Which is why I will NEVER make any of their reports public. >>>

Self-contradictory statements about revealing people's identities, how about that?

But my real comment is about the Dick Tracy MIB fantasies and the alleged negative consequences for being associated with a measly 555 timer circuit firing a MOSFET, presented by a woman that knows almost nothing about electronics.

No negative consequences ever fell on people that witnessed, or were involved with, the 2002 circuit.  I state this by analyzing the situation rationally.  If anything, Rosemary's stories if true are purely coincidental.

[Farmhand]

I have a question I would very much appreciate a frank and honest answer to.

What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?

Remember a Qualified EE is watching you watching the experimenter so no one hides anything which I'm sure is the intention
you guys had anyway i just mentioned it so no one new could bring up checking the checkers at a later date. It's already considered
that way. 

Remember I respect you trained folks a great deal. And hope to do some formal training myself if I can manage it. I'm all for it.

It's just a curiosity question.

Cheers.

None of the main debunkers have replied to this. Am I to assume none have an opinion or plan for this unlikely event ?

Seems like if youse ever expected to see it you would have thought about what you would do.

I certainly don't think anyone is claiming a closed system. So even if an arrangement went over 100% there is still no OU is there ?

Cheers