Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

The general level of his understanding about power engineering is HIGHLY suspect. The more so when he writes that V=IR.  What NONSENSE.  Where did that come from?  Isn't HE claiming to the be teacher here?  Isn't he the one who considers himself a 'better' as he puts it?  He challenges me personally to 'do the math'.  And then he proceeds to give us this?  V=IR=20 x 50 = 1000 Volts  As I said.  He needs to do better.  Less insult - more science - and I think we'd all have been interested.  But he's grown sloppy, reckless.  And worse still - he's taken us all for fools.

You are all fools Ainslie, fools that don't know where PI=3.14 comes from, fools that don't know where V=IR comes from and fools that cannot even read internet references. Do you want to know where V=IR comes from? CRACK A BOOK, you ignorant troll.

However I do not believe that there is any "we" left for you. YOU are the only person who still believes that anything you say could be correct or true.

KEEP DIGGING, ignorant troll queen. With each stupid post, each whining lying assertion you make, it becomes more and more obvious just what you really are. Donovan Martin must be either completely ignoring you, hanging you out to dry, or he is facepalming and blushing with embarrassment that he ever became associated with such a lying, ignorant troll as you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm%27s_law

[TinselKoala]

And this is for our picowatT.  A common gate amplifier requires - AT ITS LEAST - a signal to the Gate of the MOSFET.  If the Gate is FLOATING it CANNOT DETECT A SIGNAL.  It's an OPEN CIRCUIT.  What you all have to argue is that you can generate that oscillation - at the level illustrated on that Test 4 paper 1 - which Little TK has now replicated - without ANY signal applied to that Gate of Q2 while Q1 is OUT of the picture.  It is my opinion that it may prove challenging.  It's VERY easy to test.  And then you ALSO have to argue the fact that the switch still operates in both cycles.  Notwithstanding that OPEN GATE.  And you ALSO have to argue that the current flowing during that oscillation is somehow coming from the battery when the waveform is decidedly AC and it's COOKING the resistor.  You recall that the ONLY PATH that's been identified for this battery discharge - is THROUGH the function generator.  You can't deny this.  TK's done that replication.  And you'll note that the amount of current required to cook that element - to BURN IT BLACK - as our Little TK's shown - would be FAR GREATER than the function generator's probes could maintain.  By TK's own admission.

My my, PicoWatt. Didn't you pay attention when you were in Injunearing skool? Can't you see that a Common Gate Amplifier could never work? You should be grateful to Ainslie for enlightening you in this matter.

The charring on my load, to which the lying troll queen Ainslie refers, was of course produced by LONG Q1 ON times, the only way to get substantial heating from the circuit under test. Again she lies about me and my work. She cannot make a single post without making a false claim, lying about something and insulting someone.

AGAIN:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_gate

She is right about one thing, though: It is indeed VERY EASY TO TEST. Too bad she has neither the wit nor the skill to do so for herself. But others reading here certainly do, DONOVAN MARTIN certainly does, and SWeir certainly can explain to her why her emissions are so much nonsense.

And you'll note that the amount of current required to cook that element - to BURN IT BLACK - as our Little TK's shown - would be FAR GREATER than the function generator's probes could maintain.  By TK's own admission.

What an abject and transparent LIAR this troll queen is. When the Q1 is ON the FG is not involved in the current loop! NONE OF THE LOAD CURRENT, no major current,  PASSES THROUGH THE FG WHEN THE Q1 TRANSISTOR IS ON. "By my own admission".

[picowatt]

TK,

Surely by now you have realized the waste of time it is trying to argue with or teach her anything...

I know I have...

PW

[TinselKoala]

TK,

Surely by now you have realized the waste of time it is trying to argue with or teach her anything...

I know I have...

PW

Of course I realize this, friend PW. I have known this ever since 2009, when she refused to believe that the 555 timer circuit that she published did not operate as she claimed it did, in spite of the evidence and very clear demonstrations that I produced at the time.

At this point it should be clear that the reason for my demonstrations is to show _other people_ that Ainslie is a liar, an ignorant fool, and that all of those claims she makes, particularly the ones concerning me and my work, are just insane delusions on her part. The past few days, with her increasingly ignorant and vitriolic posts, have just given me more opportunities to show that this is so. The more she denies the reality of the operation of the Common Gate Amplifier that makes up the Q2 half of the 5-mosfet circuit, the easier and more fun this becomes. You may note that in those last videos, I adopt the tone of a pet owner whose dog has just shat on the floor inside the house. And Ainslie, with her response, has proven herself to be even less intelligent than that dog.

Stay tuned, I have just shot another demonstration video which ONCE AGAIN demonstrates that the common gate amplifier oscillates with only the FG RED lead connected to the Source pin of the mosfet, and the Gate of the mosfet connected to the negative pole of the main battery (and of course to the BLACK FG output lead). I used only three AA batteries initially and then substituted the FG for that bias source. The video is processing and will be uploaded in an hour or so. Ainslie, if she watches it at all, will once again accuse me of fakery.... but is of course unwilling to say just HOW I could possibly fake something so simple, nor is she willing to try the simple experiments for herself -- since she KNOWS everything there is to know about mosfet behaviour already. She has actually accused me of displaying a Stored Waveform.... on the magic Tektronix 2213A hundred-dollar-garage-sale oscilloscope. It is to laugh.

[TinselKoala]

Here's an example of an excellent Teacher actually trying to Teach the Great Scientist something that she _knows_ is false. I suppose Poynt99 may still believe that it is possible to overcome Ainslie's arrogance and her blind worship of her ignorant "thesis". It's sad, because I'm sure he has better and more rewarding things to do.