Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


I need help to get this EV GRAY type system to work

Started by ranuhook, September 30, 2013, 11:43:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Tarsier_79

Agreed, the circuit is rubbish.

In this instance, the inverter is most likely 220V @ 50 or 60Hz. You then rectify 60VAC to about 80V Pulsed DC, then basically shorting the 80V to 24V battery.

The problem is the current. Diodes drop about 0.7V, so you are trying to force the 80V to be within 0.7V of 24V....where will it break?

onepower

Tarsier_79

As a general rule most of what we see on the internet is nonsense, generally 99% nonsense if it's coming out of Russia or China.

I like rexresearch, http://www.rexresearch.com/evgray/1gray.htm
Rexresearch has been around a long time and has been proven to be a credible source for information. It's credible because they show the information which is out there without drama or opinion.

The picture below is from the Gray patent which is the only circuit worth replicating.

AC

AlienGrey

Quote from: onepower on June 07, 2023, 12:30:50 PM
Tarsier_79

As a general rule most of what we see on the internet is nonsense, generally 99% nonsense if it's coming out of Russia or China.

I like rexresearch, http://www.rexresearch.com/evgray/1gray.htm
Rexresearch has been around a long time and has been proven to be a credible source for information. It's credible because they show the information which is out there without drama or opinion.

The picture below is from the Gray patent which is the only circuit worth replicating.

AC
Are you for real ??? any with a degree can see the posted circuit your advising others to build
is full of bugs and short circuits.

Sil

onepower

As nix85 pointed out in his posts on the Holcomb thread yesterday. It's not the complex or mysterious stuff that eludes most people it's the basics hiding in plain sight. You see, there is no such thing as being "objective" when our subconscious mind discards 99% of what our eye's see which is obviously "subjective". It only let's us see what it thinks is directly related to the task at hand based on our own world view but seldom the actual facts of any matter. A real man does not let fickle beliefs rule him but submits to reality no matter how harsh it may seem.

For example, look at the EV gray circuit I posted prior and below, what do you see?. Probably nothing which makes any sense but let's look at the conversion tube labelled as circuit element #14 in the diagram. So we know from the patent the capacitor 16 is charged to high voltage preferably 1kV as a minimum but I found 5kV to 10kV is optimal. The top positively (+) charged HV capacitor plate on cap 16 is connected to the rod 12 in the center of the conversion tube. The (+) HV potential on the center rod 12 is assumed to jump to the next conductor 32, through a carbon resistor 30, then on to conductor 22 then to a series of switches. We see the same thing happening in the expanded diagram of the conversion tube below.

It's supposedly obvious, in plain sight and only a fool would dispute it however it's not even remotely true, it's a deception...

If anyone had actually bothered to see what is actually present they would realize the conversion tube plates 34 are near 50% closer to the (+) charged rod 12 than the opposing element 32 and the resistor. Thus when I built and tested this circuit to scale the arc jumped from rod 12 to the concentric plates 34, through the motor coils 36, charging capacitor 38. The discharge path was then from capacitor 38, through the motor coils 36, to the upper conversion rod 32/resistor 30 and onto the supply batteries.

It's the damnedest thing because I have talked with countless people in the forums who worked decades on this patent who never got any positive results and had literally no idea the gap between 12-32 and 12-34 was different. Look at it, "LOOK AT IT"  in both diagrams we can clearly see an obvious difference in the gaps so how in the hell could so many people completely screw up something so simple?.

In this respect Nikola Tesla's friend Mark Twain nailed it...
QuoteIt Ain't What You Don't Know That Gets You Into Trouble. It's What You Know for Sure That Just Ain't So

AC




alan

Put Don Smith's induction coils next to the conversion tube and compare them. Short HV pulses have something in their transients.