Self accelerating reed switch magnet spinner.

[synchro1]

@Conradelektro,


You act like you're the only one paying attention to this thread. What about all the other people learning from me. Who are you to tell me I'm writing too much? I'll write all I want. This is my thread! Who appointed you censor? You're the one that post phoned the test and ran too much rubbish for two weeks over the Holidays.


Quote from Conradelektro;


"And again I have to tell you, a bigger magnet can not do anything more in principle than a smaller magnet. It is the hallmark of a delusion that faster and bigger does it".


This quote from you is really really stupid!

You should try and stack all the magnets you have together, including the radials of different dimension. Strip everything down, all the rotors the levitator etc. Lash wrap a single layer, then test for the spontaneous output. Improvise a solution! Go where no man has gone before! You want a 3-D schematic in triplicate of what a "Single Wrap" is supposed to look like. You have allot of nerve calling me lame. Just go for it!
                 

[MileHigh]

This is the inescapable reality:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html#c1

Faraday's Law:

Any change in the magnetic environment of a coil of wire will cause a voltage (emf) to be "induced" in the coil. No matter how the change is produced, the voltage will be generated. The change could be produced by changing the magnetic field strength, moving a magnet toward or away from the coil, moving the coil into or out of the magnetic field, rotating the coil relative to the magnet, etc.

Faraday's law is a fundamental relationship which comes from Maxwell's equations. It serves as a succinct summary of the ways a voltage (or emf) may be generated by a changing magnetic environment. The induced emf in a coil is equal to the negative of the rate of change of magnetic flux times the number of turns in the coil. It involves the interaction of charge with magnetic field.

There is just no validity to what you are alleging Synchro1.  I challenge you yourself to prove otherwise.

MileHigh

[synchro1]

I first noticed the "Cook effect" while spinning magnets inside coil cores. There's a brown coil wrapped serial bifilar in the group photo on the last page. I noticed a voltage across the wraps while the rotor magnet was stopped inside that coil. The rotor was a 1&1/2" diametric neo on an internal axle. I began to explore this effect and it led me to the "Cook battery". Therefore it's much easier to get the "Cook effect" then outlined by me. This diametric tube was on the perpendicular, across the inside of the coil core. A very powerful magnet too, but merely one magnet. That's all it took for me to get the effect the first time! I discovered the self oscillation intensified dramatically by accident, when my first "Cook battery" fell into a spinning rotor. I self looped that model, and the source battery began to charge furiously, and the charge held. I believe this kind of "Flux field generator" has the potential to replace fission power. I don't want it trivialized by an "Egotistical Pretender"! The "A" vector potential is real, and it's assisted self oscillation from rotor resonance is a very powerful generating source of electricity!        


Incidentally; It helps to warm a newly wound coil up by running a little current through it from a battery before you start testing with it!

[MileHigh]

Synchro1:

It helps to warm a newly wound coil up by running a little current through it from a battery before you start testing with it!

You should start doing stand-up comedy at tech trade shows!

If you mean the "Jeff Cook" effect like we see in these videos....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMm70qQ5Jms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA-6PSO2A_k

....then it is yet another misfire.   All that you are seeing is the magnet in the tube "falling" into its lowest magnetic potential energy state.  You know like when you stand a pencil vertically on end and then it falls over and likes flat on the table?

Assuming that I am correct and I have the right "Cook" effect then it's just another example of ignorance leading people down a garden path of their own making.  There is no such thing as the "Cook" effect.  Yet another reason to open up a book.

MileHigh

[synchro1]

@Conradelectro,


Please check the voltage on the "Synchro Coil" capacitor periodically to see if any charge begins to build up over the course of time. The coil and capacitor constitute an LC tank . There's a strong chance that a tiny amount of power will begin to seep in and start to develop and that the magnets will then have a chance to begin to assist the oscillation.  

Here's an informative analysis by JLN of an LC tank with iron inductor core in his Parametric Power Transfer experiment:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/paraintr.htm


Initially, I explicitly requested that you test the "Synchro coil" with a 100uF Hi-voltage capacitor attached as an LC tank magnet assisted oscillator coil. This was just a ballpark guess by me based on my estimate of wire length. Milehigh interfered and persuaded you to remove the capacitor altogether, and replace it with resistors. This constituted a radical departure from my instructions! After taking sufficient time to think it over, I now firmly believe that Milehigh's over meddling was the primary cause of our failure! Tinselkoala can tell you how much of a major difference not having the capacitor in place would make! What we need to do now is to match a new capacitor value to the actual bifilar coil's inductance to achieve peak resonance! JLN calls the increased output created by the addition of the core to the LC tank, "Parametric Power Transfer". Our experiment is nearly identical to JLN's, except we have magnets in place of iron ferrite for a coil core, and we're inducing AC current mechanically instead of with integrated circuitry. 

Milehigh really bombed in on us like a "Barrel of Monkeys"!