Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.


MarkE

It looks like this thread is winding down.  I'll leave this drawing for interested parties to chew on.  It shows the complete linear equation set that describes the restoring force of the compression spring behavior exhibited by the "ideal ZED".  The r4 spreadsheet previously posted and that at least webby1 has been playing with calculates effectively using these equations.  The equations do not handle annular ring overflow or underflow. 

As has been pointed out many times already:  A ZED is a device that just lifts and lowers weights.  Gravity is a conservative force:  The gravitational energy potential of an object at some height is the same no matter what path the object takes to reach that height.  One can lift and lower a weight all day, all month, or for a millenium and one will not gain any potential energy traversing some path from a given starting height back to the same ending height.  This holds true no matter what the Bible thumping fraud Wayne Travis or his lackeys try to say about the matter.

minnie




    Good question MarkE,
                                  the sun's set but will it rise again?
   Will this thing keep on with its wax and Wayne cycle?
   Will it wEBBy and flow again?
   Mike we see some more input?
   Will Larry carry on with the flow assist?
   It all remains to be seen!
                   John.
[size=78%]    [/size]

MarkE

I have little doubt that Wayne Travis will carry on the fraud as long as he possibly can.  Investors can and should sue his professional engineer Kevan Riley for promoting HER/Zydro's obviously false claims.  Unless he has written records disclaiming his support of Wayne Travis / HER / Zydro's blatantly fraudulent claims, I think that he is completely exposed to investor lawsuits.  Unless I am mistaken, he continued to support this fraud.  Depending on how much E&O insurance Riley carries the investors may get a good percentage of their money back via that path.  Other avenues of recovery are less certain.  The money that HER/Zydro has already spent is gone.  It is unlikely that a lawsuit against them would yield much.  That would leave recovery down to the personal assets of our Bible thumping free energy promoting fraudster: Wayne Travis.  Pictured here, he resembles a funeral director in a cemetery garden.  It's fitting as he's seen to it that investor funds have gone off to their final resting place.

powercat

This thread will join the many others that have been unable to prove their claim, and have been shown to be fraudulent, to the more experienced members it would seem so obvious when the inventor fails to show a continuous running device, but these fraudulent inventors always have excuses and diversionary tactics.
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall