Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

  Hi Trolls,
             can any one of you come up with one fact in support of the excess produced by
   a ZED from Red,Wayne,Mike,Tom,Tom or Larry?
       I realise that's going to be a tough question!
                           John.

Can you really miss it?
It is not tough to see it...
oh brother.....John
You get back out what you put in - and do work........ that is two outs for one in???
Does it seem that hard? Or are you just adding comic relief..

Thanks....

[orbut 3000]

mrwayne, why don't you put all the allegations that you are a con man and fraud to rest once and for all by simply proving your silly claim?
In plain English and complete sentences?

Please.

[mrwayne]

     I seem to run in to a see-saw problem.
      If you have a see-saw with 100 units on each side it is balanced so you add one
      to one side which then descends.
      If you take 50 off the light side (work done) and transfer 50 from the heavy side
      to light side you end up with 50 one side and 51 on the other so you have to say
       put another 2 on to get it to go again.
           I wonder if Travis would have a similar problem?
                          John.

That does not describe the anomaly with the ZED.
Thanks

[mrwayne]

mrwayne, why don't you put all the allegations that you are a con man and fraud to rest once and for all by simply proving your silly claim?
In plain English and complete sentences?

Please.

I am sorry orbut - what is silly about it?

[orbut 3000]

I am sorry orbut - what is silly about it?

It's silly to expect excess energy emerging from a sequence of lossy processes.
It's even sillier to expect such a thing to happen when the promoter of such a scheme acts like 'mrwayne' as documented in this thread.