Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

To all:
We have worked hard to develop our technology and then some more.
We have had incredible selfless help - guidance - and support.
We are so blessed, the source code to free energy has been unlocked -
I waded thru crap here to share... the rest of you are awesome!
Tomorrow is the last day.
I will check back tomorrow.
Good night
 

[MarkE]

What I am trying to determine from this exercise is if an Ideal ZED acts analogous to a simple (or compound) hydraulic cylinder as has been contended as the basis for previous "proofs" of the impossibility of the actual functionality of the "dual ZED" devices demonstrated by Wayne Travis to Mark Dansie.

It does act like a crippled hydraulic cylinder.  That should be self-evident by now.

I appreciate our mutual understanding of the "Ideal" Analysis.  And I also agree that by the definition of an Ideal Analysis, any real world device must display efficiencies below that of the ideal device.

And this is my favorite part so far!  And I thank you for teaching again.

I did pick up on the hints (I believe) and understood them to mean that the Energy that could be extracted from the difference in the Energy between State 3 and State 1 would be 1/2 that total (and not the 100% I used to calculate the 88.3% efficiency).  But I had not considered that this could make the efficiency greater.  I also do not fully understand how?

BTW, my water heater has blown and I am now stuck at home for tomorrow.  I hope to be able to mentally digest all the logic changes due to the interesting negative GPE revelations.  But for now I may be preoccupied with if I can comfortably wash my face in the morning.  So please grant me a short hiatus.

Once again, I do greatly appreciate when you teach.

M.

Good luck with the water heater.

[MarkE]

Looking at a system to see if it conserves energy..................
......................
The Zed is not a conserves energy process...... it is a force amplification - with reduced input - which results in NET available energy.
If you are looking for a single process to gain.... you have not understood that our system is not an OU device -
Thanks

The ZED is absolutely subject to the Laws of Energy.  Force is not conserved.  But you simply reject these lessons each time they are presented because they contradict your lies.

Your machine is not an OU device that is certain.  Neither is it any other name you or anyone else would put on something that does as you falsely claim:  produce energy for free.

[LibreEnergia]

Looking at a system to see if it conserves energy..................
......................
The Zed is not a conserves energy process...... it is a force amplification - with reduced input - which results in NET available energy.
If you are looking for a single process to gain.... you have not understood that our system is not an OU device -
Thanks

Wayne, your descriptions are  meaningless crap and you know it.

The description "force amplification - with reduced input " IS identically equal to saying that it is an over-unity device.

Would you like to invent some more spin to try and convince the weak minded?

Your machine would appear to raise and lower masses correct? This does not give rise to net energy output.
You machine compresses/expands air somewhat..? again not an net energy producing effect.
A buoyant object moves up and down..? again, not an net energy producing process.

What else does it do? magic? if so describe that...

[MarkE]

To all:
We have worked hard to develop our technology and then some more.

It is such a shame that you do not now have nor have you ever had a technology such as you falsely claim.

We have had incredible selfless help - guidance - and support.

It's amazing the amount of help a shameless huckster can elicit.

We are so blessed, the source code to free energy has been unlocked -

Too bad that there isn't any free energy to be had from your contraptions.  But don't let that stop you from thumping your Bible.

I waded thru crap here to share... the rest of you are awesome!
Tomorrow is the last day.
I will check back tomorrow.
Good night

Hmm, you must be working with a different calendar than me.  Who knows, maybe you will get that knock on your door Thursday after all.  It's just something that I don't know.  Do you keep plenty of hot coffee and donuts around for visitors?

Viva!  Las Vegas!