Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Wayne, your descriptions are  meaningless crap and you know it.

The description "force amplification - with reduced input " IS identically equal to saying that it is an over-unity device.

Would you like to invent some more spin to try and convince the weak minded?

Your machine would appear to raise and lower masses correct? This does not give rise to net energy output.
You machine compresses/expands air somewhat..? again not an net energy producing effect.
A buoyant object moves up and down..? again, not an net energy producing process.

What else does it do? magic? if so describe that...

I am not sure who you refer to as weak minded?
I don't see either side of this discussion as weak minded. I see some people who do not think outside parameters they have ingrained in their heads - and those willing to look beyond the standard education system.
As far as my "meanings" - do you have a vocabulary to describe a real free energy device -
Not an easy discussion -  and then try to have that discussion with individuals who think shoving everything into their mental box makes it right and what does not fit in their mental box must not be allowed in the discussion.
.........................
I could, but will not waste my last day sharing all of the unprofessional conducts by others on this Web Site - they made their own bed - for history - I had no ill will for them.
.........................
In my life I have had to face armed robbers, crazed dope heads, punks and bullies...I have had to protect my family and our liberty.
The punk threats by MarkE against my liberty......oh brother ...... big man safe behind his computer. What I see.......All that intelligence wasted. A wise man told me - in life - someone had to be the bad example.
You started asking good questions - oh yeah...I did not forget the insults of your past - but again - they only harm those speaking... I did not hold it against you.
No matter what you think you know - question it.
My time is very short, take care... but think outside a bit.
The BINGO post was the path out of the box......
Good luck.

[MarkE]

I am not sure who you refer to as weak minded?
I don't see either side of this discussion as weak minded. I see some people who do not think outside parameters they have ingrained in their heads - and those willing to look beyond the standard education system.
As far as my "meanings" - do you have a vocabulary to describe a real free energy device -
Not an easy discussion -  and then try to have that discussion with individuals who think shoving everything into their mental box makes it right and what does not fit in their mental box must not be allowed in the discussion.
.........................
I could, but will not waste my last day sharing all of the unprofessional conducts by others on this Web Site - they made their own bed - for history - I had no ill will for them.
.........................
In my life I have had to face armed robbers, crazed dope heads, punks and bullies...I have had to protect my family and our liberty.
The punk threats by MarkE against my liberty......oh brother ...... big man safe behind his computer. What I see.......All that intelligence wasted. A wise man told me - in life - someone had to be the bad example.
You started asking good questions - oh yeah...I did not forget the insults of your past - but again - they only harm those speaking... I did not hold it against you.
No matter what you think you know - question it.
My time is very short, take care... but think outside a bit.
The BINGO post was the path out of the box......
Good luck.

The fraud Wayne Travis repeats his suggestions that there is something behind his tattered curtain.  There isn't.

[mrwayne]

The fraud Wayne Travis repeats his suggestions that there is something behind his tattered curtain.  There isn't.

Dear MarkE,

I have not hid behind anything.

My Name and Address and phone number is posted here....

--- big difference between you and I, I focus on my technology....

Do some good - go invent something..

Take Care.

[minnie]

    What about capturing an under water fart in a suitable container, displacing some
     water and bingo you've a way of turning buoyancy on?
                       John.

[MarkE]

Dear MarkE,

I have not hid behind anything.

My Name and Address and phone number is posted here....

--- big difference between you and I, I focus on my technology....

Do some good - go invent something..

Take Care.

The fraud: Wayne Travis speaks.  You don't have any technology Wayne.  You have the lies you use to sell your bogus investments.

Here is a quick pop quiz:  Suppose Wayne wants to lift a 1kg payload weight 100cm.  Let's help Wayne find the most efficient means to do that.  Assume all the gear is frictionless, and structure mass is zero.

a. How about a block and tackle.  It will take just a smidge more than 0.98J to lift the weight 100cm.
b. How about a hydraulic ram?  How much will it take?
c. How about a buoyancy device?  How much will it take?
c.1. How about a ZED like buoyancy device?  How much energy will it take?