Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mondrasek]

Sorry that this might be a bit off topic.  But I have a question.

Say I was happily married to a woman for many years.  We shared our dreams and ambitions and were blessed with children.  And along our journey together she confided in me her desire to start an Invisible Pink Unicorn pet ranch.  And because we were a wedded team, I supported her and her dream to start that Invisible Pink Unicorn pet ranch.

But after many years, we have grown apart.  I no longer wish to be married to this woman for reasons that are not important to disclose.  And so we divorce.

But after we divorce (and she moves on) I learn that she has, in fact, created an Invisible Pink Unicorn!  And not only that one, but she has several and has started a breeding program!  Her dreams of having an Invisible Pink Unicorn pet ranch are being fulfilled!  And she has investors supporting and great profit potential.

So back to my question:  Even though we are divorced...  Can I successfully sue her for any portion of her current "pet ranch" value or potential future profits?  I mean, I did support her through all of the years prior to those dreams becoming fulfilled, right?

[MarkE]

Sorry that this might be a bit off topic.  But I have a question.

Say I was happily married to a woman for many years.  We shared our dreams and ambitions and were blessed with children.  And along our journey together she confided in me her desire to start an Invisible Pink Unicorn pet ranch.  And because we were a wedded team, I supported her and her dream to start that Invisible Pink Unicorn pet ranch.

But after many years, we have grown apart.  I no longer wish to be married to this woman for reasons that are not important to disclose.  And so we divorce.

But after we divorce (and she moves on) I learn that she has, in fact, created an Invisible Pink Unicorn!  And not only that one, but she has several and has started a breading program!  Her dreams of having an Invisible Pink Unicorn pet ranch are being fulfilled!  And she has investors supporting and great profit potential.

So back to my question:  Even though we are divorced...  Can I successfully sue her for any portion of her current "pet ranch" value or potential future profits?  I mean, I did support her through all of the years prior to those dreams becoming fulfilled, right?

Did you live and divorce in a community property state?  Did she fail to list her assets during the divorce proceedings?  If these unicorns are invisible, how do you know that they are pink?  Is pink a more valuable shade of invisible than tan?  What kind of mileage do these unicorns get when fitted with a CVT?  How about turbo chargers?

As improbable as your wife's dreams might be, they are infinitely more realizable than HER/Zydro's false claims to free energy.

[MarkE]

Because you are making claims on there behalf, so you would need to be in contact with them to be able to speak for them.  That also then would mean that you have first hand knowledge that they are not happy with there investment, supporting your claim that they are not.

Absent this connection and first hand knowledge then you are making false claims and or statements on there behalf.

Ah there you go again, constructing men of straw so that you may charge and slay them.  Anyone who has given Wayne Travis money for his fraudulent free energy claims is gullible.  If you have cash to spare there are opportunities in:  Very fast growing bean stalks, high toll opportunity thoroughfares in certain midAtlantic states, ocean front land in Florida,  security cases loaded with cash in Amsterdam, and  free energy machines in Chickasha OK.

[Pirate88179]

Exactly John,, if you have more torque than needed you could make more speed with it,, simple really.

Not so at all.  The wind resistance increases exponentially.  The drag at 40 mph is not 2 x that at 20 mph, it is 4 times!!!  The theory of marginal utility is involved here.  I wish folks would take some physics courses.

Bill

[SeaMonkey]

...ability to suck money out of the wallets of gullible investors.

Ah yes, the cost of becoming educated.  Hopefully their
gullibility is cured in the process.  I suppose one should
have empathy for those investors when their gambles
do not pay off.  Wouldn't it be nice if wisdom came without
penalties?

So the tag-team match continues.  With occasional
interludes of entertainment provided thoughtfully
by MileHigh.

I foresee a winner to this contest down the road a ways
yet - the one who plays by Gentlemen's Rules to the
conclusion.  There may be two or more.