Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[PiCéd]

The questions are:
What is the factor Q in serie ?
Is the voltage in resonance is in fact superior to 24000 volts ?

[MileHigh]

Jbignes5:

There is no reason that we can't discuss the evolution of this QEG project in a civil way.  The notion that "impulse technology" is something not understood is simply not true.  That book by Gerry Vassilatos is the equivalent of supermarket tabloid trash masquerading as a "serious" book.

Here is a funny quote from an Amazon reviewer of his "Lost Science" book:

This is the only book that I bought in the authors substantial output and will be the only one.  It suffers from one basic flaw and that is simply put, the author does not give one, not one single source for any claim made on any page in the book.  In the back of the book is a bibliography.  In this he quotes from FIVE of his own books, the Vril Compendium Series. So, the reader of Lost Science has to then hope that those books will have some sources, etc.  Take for example the material on T.T. Brown.  When he writes with great certainty the events he says happened to Brown he does not give a source.

Here is a 976 page serious science book on "impulse technology:"

http://www.introni.it/pdf/Millman%20-%20Taub%20-%20Pulse%20and%20Digital%20Switching%20Waveforms%201965.pdf

I could pull up 100 more links on stuff like this.  So believe me when I tell you that there is no basis in fact about the "secret" of "impulse technology."

If you want to disagree, then fine.  Just don't act like a schoolyard bully in grade 6.

Going back to the QEG, I did read a reference somewhere that somebody got about 50% efficiency.  I believe that it was 1000 watts in and 500 (possibly 400) watts out.   I think there is also a related YouTube clip where the system reaches resonance and the light bulb load lights up.

The big question in my mind is if the people that bought into this thing will be upset assuming that it's proven to fail to work.  Will there be a big backlash?   Suppose you have a group of 10 people that put in 500 bucks each.  So with their $5000 they build a faithful replication and it doesn't work as claimed.  If within that group of 10 people you have one person that really knows what they are doing technically, and one or two people that don't come from the culture of the free energy forums and are upset, there could be a lot of heat brought down on HopeGirl and the Fix the World group.

Time will tell.

MileHigh

[PiCéd]

Or the way is to simply do the same resonance frequency to secondary?

[wattsup]

@MH

Rodin may be a joke if it is only used for spinning a sphere magnet but Rodin is no joke if the effect is real. Vortex, spinning fields or virtual spinning fields do exist and so does the ability of an alternator stator to output from rotation. Just look at how the windings are done in an alternator stator. Very analog to a Rodin. Pairing these would be a natural fit. I am not inferring that there is no R&D involved because there always is. Lastly, when I post, I am usually talking to the majority who never post and I know who are looking for ideas to push them near a new edge which is the basic foundation of OU research. I see a guy doing experiments and I try to push them further along because it is a mutual learning experience.

@stefan

Why am I not surprised. So as usual, we have to do better.

@Magluvin

Lets say we negate the possibility of any field in the cores and are null of magnetic field. Unless possibly Earths field has a part in it.(Rotate the box in different directions to find out?) If the thought of just the changing value of inductance is the effect producer, then there is another way of changing the inductance other than changing the core values as Luc has demonstrated.

Yes I was thinking the same thing. There may be a preferred angle that will produce even slightly more output on the primary or secondary since both are really secondaries if you are considering this.

@gotoluc

I'll energize the solenoid and measure it for you Thursday night. Been busy with other stuff.

Another point is that the solenoid does not have to move the I core flat-to-flat (f2f) (although testing f2f would be good) on the E core. The I core could have a pivot on one end and do the same thing. That would support a good majority of the weight of the I core so the solenoid is free to just provide the motion. Actually the I core on a pivot and then complete I/E core assembly secured at a slight angle to keep the I core centered on its pivot point will lower the movement energy even more. Also, you could have an I core on a pivot (or f2f) between two E cores, so at each back or forth movement an E core is contacted by that one I core. I can go on and on but the basic idea is to not rotate the I core.

This could even be used by ocean waves, pushing then pulling back I core structures.

I consider that the I/E MOT cores plus the copper wires are already energized by the Earth field. What I mean by energized is better said that it is biased by the Earth field. The approaching I core changes the bias of that contact area of the core and that change is sensed by both the primary and secondary that creates a potential difference in the coils, hence output. When the I core leaves, the Earth field then spins, rewinds, resets or re-biases everything back to their original bias so fast thus producing a second change that translates to more output, so half (or more) of the work is being done by the Earth field in this type of setup that would be totally dependent on the Earth fields' contribution to the effect.

By contrast, when you pulse DC or apply AC, the produced fluctuation is continuously controlling all aspects of the biasing polarity changes in the core so the Earth field is just there as an impartial observer and not really participating to any great degree in adding its impress to the overall system. Actually the Earth field would be acting as a constant break or damper in these circumstances because it supplies a its own bias orientation against the two polarities of the pulse. Yes it will be very slight but it will always be there all the same.

So this would be more of a passive system that would be harnessing energy from the Earth field. Cool.

@gotoluc and @woopy

If there is Earth bias at play, maybe consider placing a ground wire at different locations on the MOT core via a remote switch to see if while the I core passes through, does the output change. Maybe the Earth ground can be used on the E core to create an even greater change. With the ground being switched you can try switching in the ground when the I core is at closest position to see if there are not only regions of the core but timing as well to apply the ground against the Earth field bias. Coils love change so the name of the game is to increase the change via any minimal energy consuming method. Also, the I core (on a pivot) could be grounded to see the effect of Earth ground (I core) meeting Earth field (E core). Just more ways to play. hehehe

wattsup

[TinselKoala]

http://www.overunity.com/14443/quantum-energy-generator-qeg-open-sourced-by-hopegirl/msg397287/#msg397287