Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MarkE]

If Yildiz and Keshe done it this long I suspect QEG will go for quite some time.

Sadly, there is a long list of people who have gotten away with making such unsubstantiated claims for many years.  I recently saw where that long time fanciful story teller Mark Goldes has nearly verbatim applied his old magnetic generator schtick to his bull shit ambient heat harvester claims.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Thank you George AKA Herm...you da man.

Regards...

[chrisC]

Greetings:
I am new to this site and am reposting the following which I have already posted on the QEG be-do.com site.
I am attaching two pdf documents.  Please read them in the following order:

1st pdf attachment (our first attempt to reverse engineer the QEG)
this posting
2nd pdf attachment (a description of our construction of a 1/4 scale version of the QEG)


Resonance Achieved!!
Development and Test of Mini-QEG
In this note, Mark and I (George, aka Herm), both electrical engineers continue into our investigation of the operating principals of the QEG. 
In our first PDF note, we reverse engineered the design of the QEG to the best of our abilities without having an actual working unit to test.  Since obtaining a full-sized core will take some time, we decided to build a smaller test device.  Our first attempt was revealed in a note describing a core fabricated from a metal tape-wound toroid with machined, clamp-on pole pieces.  This approach proved unusable because testing revealed the lack of sufficient magnetic coupling to the toroid to allow inductive modulation.  During the test, we discovered an unexpected 16 Mhz signal on the core resonance winding.  It was later discovered that this signal was emanating from the arcing of the DC motor carbon brushes.   The signal was being picked up by the core windings acting as a magnetic loop antenna.  We issued a note when this was discovered and then abandoned study of this device and constructed a new Mini-QEG.
Later, upon further contemplation, we realized that a signal of this type may have been used in the original QEG to energize the "exciter coil".  In the larger (1 HP) motor, brush arcing would produce a lower frequency signal, possibly around 1 Mhz.    The resonant "exciter coil" would pick up the signal and develop enough voltage to fire the spark gap providing a current pulse to the output winding thus polarizing the core and helping to initiate core resonance.  This possibility was demonstrated by firing a charged capacitor into the output winding of the operating mini-QEG producing a much larger output.  This effect could also be produced by using a bar magnet with one pole facing the shaft end of the mini-QEG effectively jump starting phase-locked resonance.  This resonance would continue after magnet removal.
See attached PDF  for details, schematics, and photos.

Thank you. You guys are the reason why we should not dismiss everything we think we've already been taught!
Keep up the great work - hopefully we'll see whether the QEG has real merits.


cheers,
chrisC

[MileHigh]

Captain Zero and ChrisC,

We have to get real, whether that be on the debunking side of the equation or that be on supporting side of the equation.

What that means is this:  If you endorse something as a bare minimum that should mean that you read through the material and understand it to a reasonable extent and have rendered your honest opinion about the material.

What that should not mean is this:  You endorse anything that is positive with respect to something even if you don't understand it.

When you guys say, "you da man" or "keep up the great work" you make it sound like you guys know what George and Mark are discussing in their papers.

I don't think either of you guys know or understand what is being discussed in those papers based on a large number of your previous postings.  So you are being cheerleaders without understanding the rules of the football game.

If you are going to cheerlead, then don't mislead.  If you said something like "I don't understand it but you da man" then that would be a more honest statement.  We can't go around misleading the readers now, can we?

I am not even directly discussing what is being said in the papers, I am making a generic point that is a very important issue.

I hope that you get it.  Let's not drown ourselves in B.S. and become an equally bad mirror image of your many alleged false fronts and fifth columns and paid shills.  Be truthful in your comments, and that truth must include being truthful about yourselves.

MileHigh

[chrisC]

Hey Milehigh:


I don't have a Mile High ego. I'm a Electrical Engineer/ software engineer and a inventor who sold my own patents for $ you cannot even imagined. So, can we just leave it at that. What I write to encourage others is none of your business. You can write all kinds of crap and that's what you do best. Keep on doing it. Stay out of thinking on my behalf.


cheers
chrisC