Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

Jbignes5:

No i took issue with the method to measure residual magnetism. You knew the compass had a magnet in it and hence why it was designed to look like the core was magnetized. Most uneducated people who are working here believe that crap and hence my comment that this is a bad guy tactic.

If you noticed I just kicked your butt in the previous posting.  No bad guy tactic, your comments are ridiculous.  When it comes to the educational level with respect to electronics and who is educated and who is uneducated, you have to take a good look in the mirror and be honest with yourself.

Take me off of your agenda and let's just discuss the technical aspects of Luc and Woopy's tests.

MileHigh

[jbignes5]

Ugh Milehigh please come down to earth ok.

In fact magnetism is the cause of the vibration. When a current is drawn from the coils it creates a magnetic field within the core when they align and to a certain extent when they get a certain degree from alignment. The fact that it doesn't appear to do much in the QEG design means that it might be a locking effect on the rotor of the Luc design. The important thing is that luc is also seeing an event when it goes into resonance. Lucs design isn't rigid enough to handle the abuse and must be pulling the I's into a deadlock position when that resonance is reached. This is due to current flowing in the coils and creating a magnetic field which slowly locks onto the poles.


Again why not use a toroid like I suggested with no poles. Tesla said that it was like having a toroid with unlimited poles without using poles at all in his designs. Poles create cogging and huge losses. Why not get rid of them?

I'll search for the specific Tesla saying about the pole issue. Oh and for motors poles work best I would think for maximum torque.

[gotoluc]

Hi everyone,

the suggestion of having the bulbs in series on the high voltage side has helped stabilize the Resonance.

Here is the video demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-jYPDuueY0

Luc

[gotoluc]

Luc:

I am going to give you a suggestion for using the compass with a simple example that perhaps you can apply in your own way with your setup.

We know the compass is a magnet itself.  So it has the ability to disturb it's own measurements.  This is an issue that comes up all the time in all sorts of applications of sensors.  For an example, when you use an ammeter, it disturbs the current measurement by introducing an extra resistance into the current loop.  However, you understand in most cases the disturbance is insignificant.

The way to overcome this issue with the compass is to make differential measurements.

Suppose you have a rectangular block of metal to check for residual magnetism, and you also have an identical block of metal that is not magnetized.

The compass is lined up North-South and you approach the compass with the unmagnetized metal block and place it so the compass deflects 45 degrees.  Now, since the block of metal is unmagnetized, if you turn it around by 180 degrees and put it in the same position, the compass will still be deflected by 45 degrees.

Now if you do the same test with the slightly magnetized block you will get different results.  In one position the compass might be deflected by 43 degrees.  Turn the block around and the compass might be deflected by 47 degrees.  That is clearly telling you that there is some residual magnetism in the second block of metal.

Note that you don't need the unmagnetized block of metal as a reference.  I simply used it in the description to make the point.

Your box is built so I don't know if you can make this measurement.  If you had the "I" core and the "E" core on your bench you could in theory do these tests.  Note that you have to test for the three main polarization directions for a block also, x, y, and z.  You assume that you don't know what the direction of the polarization is.

MileHigh

Thanks for the suggestions on the better way to use the compass. I'll keep it in mind for next to to check before I close cores up in a box as I think it too late now as there's not enough room to do the tests as you suggest.

Luc

[gotoluc]

Luc,
   I am the guy that PMed Woopy about striking the transformer. In my best tests last night I obtained 481 volts from the secondary winding of a 17 pound microwave oven transformer from a 1978 Sharp microwave. I used a 2 1/2 pound rod of hardened steel. Results can be obtained from striking anywhere on the laminations in any direction. The steel is not magnetic but I am aware that the core could be shifting in the bobbin although I can not detect and movement and I have the equipment to do that. Just to be sure I tried a second transformer from an old oscilloscope which have visible runs of hardened varnish still dripped all over it. The winding has taps for 130 120 110 24 12 volt. It weighs about 1.5 lbs and is about the size of my hand. The best it has produced is 108 volts. I have an old choke about the same size with only one winding that makes 10 volts every time.
    Using the microwave transformer I hooked a neon bulb across the secondary and it will blink long enough to see easily. The scope shows six or seven breaks each hit at about 170 volts.
    The first spike wave lasts almost always 250 us.
     When I strike the laminations I use a good blow but power is not as useful as sharpness. Think of striking a bell.
     I am not disputing anyone's results only saying the effect is very interesting to me.
Garry

Hi Garry,

interesting results!... can you make a video demo of your experiment?

Thanks

Luc