The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[gravityblock]

LOL, you've buried yourself with your own words.

Another assertion by you without giving any details or information on how I buried myself with my own words.  This is getting ridiculous.  I am done with you, and will be putting you on my ignore list (troll list).  It also reminds me of something I said in another thread about you in regards to "your own words", as shown in the quotes below.  You have trolled me ever since, and this exposes your vindictive nature and immaturity.  You have nothing original or meaningful to say.

Gravock

There isn't a person alive who has testified against me in open court.

There's no need for any person alive to testify against you, for you'll convict yourself in an open court by your own words.

Gravock

[MarkE]

Another assertion by you without giving any details or information on how I buried myself with my own words.  This is getting ridiculous.  I am done with you, and will be putting you on my ignore list (troll list).  It also reminds me of something I said in another thread about you in regards to "your own words", as shown in the quotes below.  You have nothing original or meaningful to say.

Gravock

LOL, one need only read your words and comprehend them to see how you have buried yourself vis-a-vis plagiarism.

[MarkE]

Once again, taxicab geometry has traditionally included elements that are not native to the geometry. The primary example is Euclidean angles. Since angles are defined as arc length along a circle and the taxicab circle is quite different than the Euclidean circle, native taxicab angles are not Euclidean. Pure taxicab geometry uses angles that are native and natural to the geometry.  I have already stated many times prior to this in regards to the diagram of sarkeizen that there was both euclidean and non-euclidean geometry in it.  You're not telling me anything I do not already know.  So, how can a euclidean circle in taxicab geometry fail one of the postulates of euclidean geometry?

Gravock

LOL.   Something that does not exist in a set cannot be evaluated by the rules that apply only to that set. 

[gravityblock]

MarkE is now on the ignore list, as shown by the snapshot below, and will no longer receive a response by me.

Gravock

[minnie]

gravityblock I've been reading this since about 05 and you've got to be in the running
for one of the most boring ever. I hope your sex life is a bit more fun!
                        John.