KARPEN PILE

[profitis]

Not jumping pomodoro?You had to open the thing up and expose it to air correct? My teacher wouldve murdered me.the climbing rate of that voltage after 24hrs short-circuit was about 0.001v/second and was exceptionally likely to accellerate its climb over time.

[profitis]

The palladium/mercury experiment is therefore deemed by me to be a total success.the palladium has to be higher up just its corner touching the top of electrolyte for even greater voltage disparity and far more rapid voltage climb due to shorter resaturation timespan.

[MarkE]

The palladium/mercury experiment is therefore deemed by me to be a total success.the palladium has to be higher up just its corner touching the top of electrolyte for even greater voltage disparity and far more rapid voltage climb due to shorter resaturation timespan.

In that case I suggest that you write out your hypothesis, and then state how the experiment falsifies the null, or is at least consistent with the hypothesis proper.

[profitis]

Its very simple @mark E.the stirring/agitation ontop the mercury had no effect to accellerate volts climb after 24hr short.the increased bubbling agitation over the palladium obviously decreased saturation time,that's the time we were supposed to wait out in this experiment.that's where pomodoro went wrong ie.interference with the timespan for resaturation.the voltage climb directly after 24hr hour short was indicative of what was going to be revealed after 2 or 3 hours rest.total success in line with reversable hydrogen spillover theory, in line with nernst theorem, in line with overpotential theorem.   

[MarkE]

Profitis:  I am not asking that you write a narrative to me.  I am suggesting that if you believe that the experiments support your ideas that you state  your hypothesis that you believe the experiments addressed, and then show preferably that the experiments falsified the null, or in the least that they support the hypothesis proper.