Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Inertia Drive project. RFDD.

Started by tinman, August 17, 2014, 06:20:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on August 24, 2014, 09:42:47 AM
I thought that the purpose of the experiment was to see if tinman's apparatus could generate a reactionless force.
It was.
I am supprised that no one has said it cant work yet-to many laws would be broken->which they wouldnt be.
A reactionless drive like mine break's no laws of physic's,but more give a better understanding as to what those !so called!laws mean.

MarkE

tinman, I think that people should be encouraged to test their ideas.

Any physical experiment necessarily conforms to nature.   Our observations and interpretations can however be very faulty.  So, we have to be careful when we think we see something extraordinary to be sure that what we think we see is really what is happening.  If you start getting results that look like they defy presently understood physics, then it will be time to look to see if there is a mistake in the experiment interpretation.

Something that you might think about adding that could be interesting would be an ordinary plumb bob. 

broli

Same design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-iE-nTDUQY

Wonder what will happen if he added weights to the wires like you did.

telecom

Quote from: broli on August 24, 2014, 11:37:44 AM
Same design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-iE-nTDUQY

Wonder what will happen if he added weights to the wires like you did.
Another:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek8keardyGs

Why not to use a different approach - two sprockets, large and small, connected by the chain, like in a bike: masses attached to the chain at the equal distances -
this should  not only provide a radius benefit, but also a mass benefit - arc
of the larger sprocket will bear more masses.

MarkE

Quote from: broli on August 24, 2014, 11:37:44 AM
Same design: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-iE-nTDUQY

Wonder what will happen if he added weights to the wires like you did.
That is the expected result.  It is what I expect we will see if tinman hangs a plumb bob as a pendulum.

Sir Isaac says that the force exerted by the discs retaining the sinker weights is equal to the mass and the acceleration that the spinning disks impose on the sinkers and the wires.  Sir Isaac says that there is no net force exerted outside that frame of reference.  Is Sir Isaac correct as the video you linked seems to show, or will tinman's sinker weights make a critical difference?  I submit that the plumb bob test will give us a strong indication.