Inertia Drive project. RFDD.

[tinman]

A question for you all.

Most(if not all) here,will be of the opinion that an inertia drive that provides a uni directional thrust or force in one direction(or most there of),is not achievable-it would break the law of the conservation of energy.But could it just be a case that the law has been misunderstood.

So my question is this--> Who here can accurately explain this law
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.\
Give an example for each
1-What is the action?
2-What is the equal reaction?
3-what is the opposite reaction?

I want you to think very carefully about Q3.

[MarkE]

A question for you all.

Most(if not all) here,will be of the opinion that an inertia drive that provides a uni directional thrust or force in one direction(or most there of),is not achievable-it would break the law of the conservation of energy.But could it just be a case that the law has been misunderstood.

So my question is this--> Who here can accurately explain this law
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.\
Give an example for each
1-What is the action?

Force is reciprocal:  Sit on a chair that is on a solid surface.  Your weight is the action applied to the chair.

2-What is the equal reaction?

The chair applies an equal force against your weight.

3-what is the opposite reaction?

The force that the chair exerts upward against your weight.  Your weight is a force that points towards the center of the earth, the chair's supporting force points identically away from the center of the earth:  Equal and opposite.

I want you to think very carefully about Q3.

There is only one reaction in Newton's Third Law, and it is equal and opposite to the action.  2) and 3) are asking about the same thing.

[tinman]

There is only one reaction in Newton's Third Law, and it is equal and opposite to the action.  2) and 3) are asking about the same thing.

Mark
I dont believe that 2 and 3 are the same-asking the same thing.
I agree that the force or pressure is equal and/or opposite,but the direction of that force or pressure(or part there of) dose not have to be opposite.
I believe that opposite in this case means only an equal amount of apposing force or pressure-but not necessarily in the opposite direction.

[CANGAS]

Well here is the start of my Inertia drive project-the RFDD engine.

The plan is to use elliptical orbits of mass(in this project,i call them satellites)to off set the reaction force associated with all actions-Reaction Force Diversion Drive (RFDD).

A US patent was issued some years ago claiming to provide unidirectional inertial thrust employing a unique elliptical path for its counter-rotating weights. Sorry, remember no more details at all and the notebook containing the copy of the patent is buried under so much other junk it would a real excavation to dig it up.

Have you done a patent search?



CANGAS 63

[CANGAS]

Mark
I dont believe that 2 and 3 are the same-asking the same thing.
I agree that the force or pressure is equal and/or opposite,but the direction of that force or pressure(or part there of) dose not have to be opposite.
I believe that opposite in this case means only an equal amount of apposing force or pressure-but not necessarily in the opposite direction.

But....Newton's equal and opposing reaction is expected to have a force component which has a unit vector exactly antiparallel the original action force unit vector, with the two magnitudes being exactly equal.


CANGAS 64