Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[synchro1]

The tiny sipping straw attached to the disposable beverage cartons fits perfectly around the axle parts. I tested a steady 300 A.C. volts generated by the carousel alternator driven by the drain motor, half of what I pre-calculated. I plan to glue everything tight and try again. So far so good. Came together like magic!

[synchro1]

The plastic straw failed to hold up, got hot and melted after an hour of running. In the meantime I managed to light a 120 volt LED off the carousel alternator, and ran the drain motor backwards with the carousel as a motor. The carousel motor has no problem turning the drain motor as an alternator.

My preliminary measurements show no rise in input amperage with the addition of the 120 volt LED bulb when the turntable motor's reversed as an alternator. I need to search for a better connector. So far the results are as good as could be anticipated. Maybe I can upload some pictures.

Let me add that it's costs a lot of power to turn these kinds of motor rotors alone just due to the magnetic cogging against the stators, regardless of any load, unlike open generator coils. Further testing's in order.

[synchro1]

This carousel alternator has to do the same amount of work whether it's loaded or not and can only run at 60 hertz the way it's configured. The results of no rise in input with addition of load may be illusory at this time.

The Chaniotakis video where he runs a "Lenz Free" D.C. generator appears to be the same illusion. The Generator's already doing it's maximum amount of work against the permanent magnets before the load's connected, so there's no possibility the input can rise. 

[synchro1]

I realized there's no way to get "Slip Turn Torque" from an electrical load with this turntable alternator. The rotor needs a physical load to lower input from drag. It would need a pulley and a fan belt. The Carousel alternator generates a fixed amount of power from a fixed amount of work. The alternator work is the same loaded or unloaded. The anomaly of reduced input from slip is still open for inquiry.

[synchro1]

The drain motor's rated for 3 Amps at 120 volts. That's 360 watts or nearly 1/2 a horsepower coming from that power hungry synchronous motor. George Chaniotakis shows an "Amazing Drop" in input with a twin core, but the motor is consuming enough power to drive a Go-Cart while ideling.

This makes me wonder what the torque in horse power is with a huge drop in input due to perhaps a saturation "Magnet Switch" effect? Consuming a tenth of the power due to an impedance effect would most likely result in a loss of torque down to .05 of a horsepower for no gain!

Ten times less power input would spin the rotor at 3K, but it would only take ten times less pressure to cause the rotor to slip. Nothing coming!