Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

Started by synchro1, August 31, 2014, 09:26:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Both George's hoax videos rival "Verproject" for their cleverness. R.P.M. is no measure of torque. Rotor pressured slip is. Rotor speed and voltage are fixed, only current can vary. Pumping water with the wash tub synchronous motor requires much more amperage then merely moving an unloaded rotor. How much pressure does it take to slow the rotor down? The pressure required to stop the rotor is directly proportional to it's amperage. This is a measure of torque. The rotor's turning at a constant 60 hertz regardless of the amount of amperage it's using. The lower the amp draw the easier the rotor slips.

These finding's don't mean the sine wave motor is unreasonable.   

synchro1

Look how these two drain motor coil cores power a hard drive with 60 hertz A.C.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHgw_l-Z_s0

Multiple rotor magnets may multiply frequency this way to exceed the CMF threshold with identical twin output coils, and eight rotor magnets. Enough N.S. rotor magnets on the disk would cause a propulsion force from the pickup coil cores.

It would take two rotors one over the other, with two magnets on the lower power rotor and six on the upper output. The output coils would need to be on the upper level with the 6 N.S. magnets. This would multiply the CMF by 3.

synchro1

Simply mounting a rotor wheel with N.S. magnets on the drain motor impellor and tapping the output from the side with another core coil would multiply the frequency over CMF for the propulsion effect.

The drain motor core coils can be used to pickup like Roberts33 shows from the side 90 degrees from the original rotor orientation.

synchro1

George Chaniotakis runs three synchronous A.C. carousel motors in series; power diminishes with additional motors:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7mYsCEHLus

This is the same illusion. The series coils raise the impedance and restrict the current flow. The real test would involve determining how much pressure it would take to make the rotor slip. It looks like the 3 motors are doing the same work when it would only take a fraction of the pressure to make the rotor slip! Torque shy rotating turntable motors.

synchro1

Take a look at Lidmotor's "Zero Force Motor". I covered the effect of Lenz reduction from re-positioning the coil at 90 degrees earlier in this thread:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAYnppXT6NE

It's plain to see that the coil poles are on the vertical plain, directed up and down away from the diametric spinner by 90 degrees! Lidmotor is overunity, reading zero input, with Maggie for load!

John Bedini is an avid fan of mine.