Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

EMJunkie


EMJunkie

Quote from: MarkE on January 05, 2015, 09:27:20 PM
E is the cross product of l and db/dt.  Where the flux is uniform:  db/dt is zero.

Some Science at last, however here in lies the problem: The sine of the voltage from Bvl changes after Zero is crossed at the Bloch Wall which does NOT support what you have been saying. You're saying that the Lines of Flux are Contiguous from Pole to Pole, so this means that the sine should stay one side of the Zero Line at all times with linear movement of either the Magnet of the Coil!

This does NOT Happen! Clearly - Experimentaly provable again!

Quote from: MarkE on January 05, 2015, 09:27:20 PM
What part of this are you having difficulty understanding?You have shown zero evidence for a Bloch Wall at the dipole center.  Reliable evidence going back 200 years points against your idea.No it isn't.  So why are you having such a hard time with it?It is one of the many experiments that refute your claims.

I hear Frustration, anger, some criticisms and some typo's - Still, the same line of force being cut with linear velocity by the inductor would NOT exhibit a change in sine - Period!

Regards

  Chris

MarkE

Quote from: EMJunkie on January 05, 2015, 09:46:50 PM
Some Science at last, however here in lies the problem: The sine  of the voltage from Bvl changes after Zero is crossed at the Bloch Wall which does NOT support what you have been saying. You're saying that the Lines of Flux are Contiguous from Pole to Pole, so this means that the sine should stay one side of the Zero Line at all times with linear movement of either the Magnet of the Coil! 
(sic) do you mean sign?  If you do it is patently obvious from my drawing that the slope crosses through zero at the midpoint of the dipole long axis.  So, you can exclaim all you want, but all you are doing is presenting yourself as ignorant of what has been placed directly before you:  The field contours are contiguous pole to pole, they become parallel at the dipole long axis midpoint, the relative slope of a parallel line is zero, and the slope off the contours on either side of the dipole midpoint have opposing signs.  All of this is nearly 200 year old science that you present yourself as willfully ignoring.
Quote

This does NOT Happen! Clearly - Experimentaly provable again!
Declare nonsense to your heart's content.
Quote

I hear Frustration, anger, some criticisms and some typo's - Still, the same line of force being cut with linear velocity by the inductor would NOT exhibit a change in sine - Period!
If you want to present yourself as having failed both geometry and calculus then be my guest.
Quote

Regards

  Chris
If in fact there were signficant curl near the dipole center as you hypothesize then a double inflection of voltage would occur as the dipole center approached and passed through the pick-up coil.  Yet no such double inflection occurs.  Ergo your hypothesis of such a curl is falsified.  Or would you now like to hypothesize entirely new laws of induction?


EMJunkie

Quote from: MarkE on January 05, 2015, 10:39:12 PM
(sic) do you mean sign?  If you do it is patently obvious from my drawing that the slope crosses through zero at the midpoint of the dipole long axis.  So, you can exclaim all you want, but all you are doing is presenting yourself as ignorant of what has been placed directly before you:  The field contours are contiguous pole to pole, they become parallel at the dipole long axis midpoint, the relative slope of a parallel line is zero, and the slope off the contours on either side of the dipole midpoint have opposing signs.  All of this is nearly 200 year old science that you present yourself as willfully ignoring.Declare nonsense to your heart's content.If you want to present yourself as having failed both geometry and calculus then be my guest.If in fact there were signficant curl near the dipole center as you hypothesize then a double inflection of voltage would occur as it passed through the pick-up coil.  Yet no such double inflection occurs.  Ergo your hypothesis of such a curl is falsified.  Or would you now like to hypothesize entirely new laws of induction?

I hear what you're saying, you want to stop at the mid-point, or Bloch Wall, get out of your car, turn the Inductor or the Magnet around, get back into your car and continue with the Linear Motion of either the Magnet or the Coil?

Induction is as it always has been, I have not made any changes to it! You're in a dream land here, what you've POSTULATED IS IMPOSSIBLE!!!

MarkE

Quote from: EMJunkie on January 05, 2015, 10:47:19 PM
I hear what you're saying, you want to stop at the mid-point, or Bloch Wall, get out of your car, turn the Inductor or the Magnet around, get back into your car and continue with the Linear Motion of either the Magnet or the Coil?

Induction is as it always has been, I have not made any changes to it! You're in a dream land here, what you've POSTULATED IS IMPOSSIBLE!!!

You're saying that in the below picture, where the conductor is shown stationary, this is where the Sine changes!!!
I see now you wish to present yourself as unable to notice the slope at different points on an ellipsoid.   I hope that what you are doing is really the put-on act that it appears to be.  If it isn't, get some basic tutoring.