The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

[paijo]

as lumen said i'll wait till mr syairchairun get permission to release from the gen designer (100 rpm gen) .

Aktif itu gan, sekrang sih saya hanya menunggu izin dari pembuatnya ( Ramadan ), apa boleh untuk dishare,
yang asli darinya itu yang 100rpm gan yang pertama x saya buat, tunggu aja saya akan kirm itu, sangat simple sih gan kerjnya

@all,mr syairchairun email is aktif,now he just wait permission from the gen maker ( Ramadan ),he may share it or not.
the original from ramadan is the 100rpm gen which mr syairchairun build in the first time,just wait i will send that,the working principle is so simple

@syairchairun ,terimakasih gan ane akan tunggu 
@marsing , ane gak ngeuh klo dsini ada tmen snegara jga  pdahal ane dah muter2 d sub forum kapanadze ampir 2 taonan  .salam kenal ya gan 

[barbosi]

As was indicated before, the working principle is described in http://www.google.com/patents/US5191258

For me, the following was the punch line:

The present invention avoids such a situation by providing for a counter-magnetic field to, in turn, reduce originally applied torque.

Regards.

[ketone]

As was indicated before, the working principle is described in http://www.google.com/patents/US5191258

For me, the following was the punch line:
Regards.

Yes, that pretty much sums it up, no need to wait, just build.

[T-1000]

Hai, after i post myvideo about generator no effect lenz law, Now I will show U it can selfrunning, only use myhand to start,
and ths video i will show short coil and no efect lenzlaw, and I will show next mygenerator 10kva its same project, differnt only its has only 4pole run in 1500rpm toget 50hz, its same with mygenrtor 5kva, in mygnrtor 5kva i use 40pole stator coil in wire pararel,220v.0.5A 50hz percoil in only 100-120 rpm, but its very expensve i use 162 prmnen mgnet and it gve very high cogng when start.

In next plan mygenrtr 10kva i dnt use prmnen mgnet, only elctromgnetc ( 80v.4A exciter), and i dnt modfication coil in stator its original, and i use coupling 1 by 1 of motor and gnerator no use pulley or gearbox, they are expnsve,

And i will show the animation how to it work,

Next video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqWU12Db_MY

I think same it wth device James W german, But it linear flux magnetic but in Ramadan device is circular flux magnetic..

The key is magnet and stator coil not spining or rotate and rotr made by softiron rotate between them..

Thank's..

The idea is simple and brilliant!
Having magnet ant coil on stator and adding soft iron rotor to make magnetic connection between them then breaking it still makes induction!
The most interesting part gets there about cogging difference as every single conventional generator have magnets or coils spinning to do same thing...
If you are familar about QEG ( http://www.fixtheworldproject.net/what-is-the-qeg-.html ) in your case there are magnets as power source instead of coils

Thanks for sharing and confirming my ideas!

[lumen]

As was indicated before, the working principle is described in http://www.google.com/patents/US5191258

For me, the following was the punch line:
Regards.

Yes, I have seen this patent many times.
You are reading something into it that's not there.

Though it's true that as you apply a load the generator becomes easier to turn, it never produces more energy than it takes.
The reason is that rotating the generator with no load takes much energy as you are changing the polarity of the iron segments many times a second. (ever heard of induction heating)

Now, as you apply a load to the generator, the iron segments try to conduct the field to the coil which resists the change so the iron becomes less magnetized making it easier to turn the generator.
If you rotate it very fast with shorted coils, it will rotate very easily as the iron remains almost non-magnetized. The down side is that the output is also near zero at this point.
So while the generator turns easier under load, it is never over unity.

What is different in the generator in the video?  I suppose I will wait and see.