Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[alan]

Both secondaries can be seen as each others primary. But, doesn't the 2nd secondary see the magnetic field of the primary in addition to the one of other secondary, cancelling the charge separation?  This confuses me.

I'm planning to use an old stand alone  cd player with audio input for signal,  to power  the coil via speaker output, should I watch out for something?

[EMJunkie]

Both secondaries can be seen as each others primary. But, doesn't the 2nd secondary see the magnetic field of the primary in addition to the one of other secondary, cancelling the charge separation?  This confuses me.

I'm planning to use an old stand alone  cd player with audio input for signal,  to power  the coil via speaker output, should I watch out for something?

@Alan,

Yes Sir, this takes some understanding like I have said! It's not easy to grasp! It takes a little time!

This is why it is So important to Experiment! Feel the device and feel what it likes and doesn't like!

Don't allow it to be Choked Off! This is the biggest problem!

To answer your question: Loose Coupling! This is why its important! Also, one will re-in-force the Primary, one will oppose!

Give it a try, it should do at least something!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[conradelektro]

@EMJunkie:

I have enough material cluttering my house to try your partnered coil idea. Thinking about a test set up some question come to my mind.


core:

1) Is it better to use a simple Ferrite rod (e.g. 6 mm diameter, length 60 mm) or rather a core from a TV fly back transformer? I also have various transformer cores (consisting of two parts, like two U-shapes or two E-shapes)? Or a steel core (steel bolt or softer nail)?


number of turns for the windings (see attached drawing taken from your Video):

2) Is the number of turns specified in the attached drawing reasonable? (If not, please suggest a useful number of turns.)


placement of the input coil (green wire in the attached drawing):

3) Is the primary (green) wound over just one of the partnered coils or over both?

4) The partnered coils are wound directly over the core and the primary is wound on top?


input signal:

5) In your video you seem to have some sort of square wave as input (to the green coil = primary). Could it alternatively be a sine wave signal from an audio amplifier?

6) Is it better to use a square wave signal or a sine wave signal (pure AC) as input?


frequency of the input signal:

7) The frequency of the input signal must some how depend on the core material. In your tests, in what frequency range was the input signal (e.g. 50 Hz to 30.000 Hz)? Must the frequency of the input cycle be varied to find an optimum output?

8: If it was a square wave signal, is a 50% duty cycle o.k., or should the duty cycle be varied to find an optimum output?


what to do with the output:

9) The partnered output coils are connected in series as in the attached drawing?

10) Is it o.k. to shorten the partnered coils (which are connected in series) with a shunt (e.g. 1 Ohm or 10 Ohm or 100 Ohm) in order to measure output with a scope probe over the shunt?


Chris, you could copy and paste my questions and just add a short comment to each (most of them need only a Yes or No or a few words). I know it is a lot to ask, sorry.

Greetings, Conrad

[hanon]

Both secondaries can be seen as each others primary. But, doesn't the 2nd secondary see the magnetic field of the primary in addition to the one of other secondary, cancelling the charge separation?  This confuses me.

Exactly this is my main concern. I wrote post #32 with a totally simetrical setup which could get rid of that problem. That setup was based on Clemente Figuera patents.

I guess that by now just want us to test the simpler device and avoid going into modifications without testing the basic scheme.

Regards

[Jeg]

I had it ready from other project and I intent to change it with E and I laminations connected the way Jensen describes. Also Jensen uses a feedback coil connected as Meyer's one, but with no diode.