Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 82 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

No comment on my wood block versus ferrite block post?

OK, another cup of coffee later...

If the EM is replaced with a PM so that there is a constant tension produced on the spring scale (irregardless of the material used for the block), is work being performed during period of time that the system remains stationary?  Would this not just be "a magnet stuck to a refrigerator" scenario?

Is it not only during the "time" period when tension is being "changed" (applied or removed) that counts as "work"?

Spilled Fluids

Quote from: tinman on July 19, 2015, 09:50:39 AM
the difference is more the car traveling down hill as apposed to up hill.
But before i go any further,we will wait for !self bouncing masses with elasticity! to answer my question.

The question has been answered by myself and two others all with the same explanation. You simply fail to understand gravity, forces and energy.

tinman

Quote from: Spilled Fluids on July 19, 2015, 10:03:28 AM
It's really quite simple;

You obviously don't even understand your won experiment.

My won experiment?--> you must be getting sleepy ;D Another spelling error?. I am glad you picked up on my gramer mistakes ;)

Quoteneither the PM nor the ferrite nor the bolt are doing any work, it is the electromagnet.

Ahh ok :o
Just remove the PM,ferrite keeper,bolt,and see how much work your electromagnet dose against the spring.

You havnt answered my question-dose it require energy to create a magnetic field?.

tinman

Quote from: Spilled Fluids on July 19, 2015, 10:05:55 AM
The question has been answered by myself and two others all with the same explanation. You simply fail to understand gravity, forces and energy.

What two others have said that the energy used to compress the ball for the second bounce is not from the energy used and stored to lift the ball to it's starting height?

tinman

Quote from: picowatt on July 19, 2015, 10:04:39 AM
No comment on my wood block versus ferrite block post?

OK, another cup of coffee later...

If the EM is replaced with a PM so that there is a constant tension produced on the spring scale (irregardless of the material used for the block), is work being performed during period of time that the system remains stationary?  Would this not just be "a magnet stuck to a refrigerator" scenario?

Is it not only during the "time" period when tension is being "changed" (applied or removed) that counts as "work"?

We are not replacing the EM with a PM,we are replacing the ferrite keeper with a PM.