Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

I can not go much lower on the CSR,as i am already at 2mV per division on my scope,and that is as low as it go's.If i lower the CSR value,then we will not see much at all in the way of a trace across the CSR.
AC/DC coupling in this case made no difference at all,and i left it as AC so as we could see any noise change within the current trace. At 1KHz,we have only a 500uS pulse,and we still see no change.

Edit:
Tomorrow i will up the input power,lower the CSR value(with a non inductive CSR),and switch back to DC coupling.
We will then carry out the same test,and post results.

If your circuit is completely dominated by series resistance then by definition you are not going to see much happen as you change the magentic circuit. Where you want to start is where you can see an inverse exponential on the current:  a fairly straight initial slope to about 60% of the final current value, then bending over to asymptotically approach to the final value.  If you are seeing something that looks much more square, then excessive circuit resistance is hiding the magnetic behavior.

[MarkE]

  I doubt that Tesla would agree with your evaluation.
   Gravity is caused by the Earth's Vortex, combined with our Solar Vortex, and Galactive vortex. All taking in and constantly pulling Aether in from the primordial soup, which some call "nothing". 
Not a closed system at all. 
  And solar energy is caused by What? Is that a "closed" system, as well? That can't be taken from?

  Anyways, no need to expound on it, quoting from the current false information that our scientists are telling us. I've heard it all before.

The important difference is that "current false information that our scientists are telling us" is backed by reliable, repeatable experiments.  You or anyone proposing alternate theories are free to enumerate experiments that you feel falsify what you think scientists are claiming that is wrong.

[NickZ]

  Again, I'm not here to prove anything to you, nor try to convince you, as you seam to think.
You are free to think, and so am I.
  To try to prove anything to you,  is like stepping on an ants nest....
  Please prove to me that light comes from the Sun to Earth.  First, as that is what you believe to be true.   
 
   I'm here to research and develop a free energy generator, a solid state one, with no moving parts.
Not to discuss what you don't believe.

[ALVARO_CS]

If a X force (impulse) is applied to an Euler disk is any work done along the full time of its resultant rotation ?

I know this is counterintuitive, but imagine a situation where two identical metallic elements (in dimensions and composition)  are given the same impulse, and one of them is previously magnetized, will it be a difference in the time of rotation ?

and may be a different amount of work done  ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJHlwJ1gsms

Enjoy

(thanks hoptoad)

Alvaro

[MarkE]

  Again, I'm not here to prove anything to you, nor try to convince you, as you seam to think.
You are free to think, and so am I.
  To try to prove anything to you,  is like stepping on an ants nest....
  Please prove to me that light comes from the Sun to Earth.  First, as that is what you believe to be true.   
 
   I'm here to research and develop a free energy generator, a solid state one, with no moving parts.
Not to discuss what you don't believe.

Like I said the difference between the views is brightly distinguished in terms of evidence.  You can reject any evidence that you want.  See how that works out for you as you pursue your stated goals.