Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Pirate88179]

Dup... Nearly missed this... Another one of Stefan's adverts...

Hahaha Bill, what a turn of events!



Now you're CLAIMING Over-Unity!!!



Hahaha, good on you old mate!!!

If you read my posts, you would see, that only four or so posts before your last spout, I did give reference to another success, measured Over-Unity! It was 101.5%


Like I said, right from day one, I am not discussing measurements, I don't need to, so many other people with much better equipment and better skills are doing what I am doing also...

I am here to show concepts that work...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Where the heck did you get a claim of overunity from me in my post?  I have NEVER made that claim.

So, you are here to show concepts that work but you will not discuss measurements?  Isn't that eliminating the one thing that will show if it "works" or not?  If not for measurements (proper ones) how else can one demonstrate that something works as claimed?

I do not follow this logic at all.  Well, I will admit that self-looping would end all discussions on measurements but I do not recall you showing that either.

Did I miss something?

Bill

PS  In my videos I do claim Free Light as my friends give me their dead batteries that they were going to throw out and I use them to light my home.  Not overunity, just free light.  Last year, we had a blackout, and about 5 of my neighbors dropped by to ask why the power was on at my place and not theirs, ha ha.

[tinman]

A blocking oscillator?
Nice name,but what actually is blocked?.
Current path diversion oscillator would be a better description.

Sure,you can decrease your power consumption by using these oscillators,but you also reduce your light output. So why not just use lower wattage light's ?. You could also put a small inline water turbine between your water supply meter and your home,so as every time you turn a tap on,the little turbine would charge a small battery bank that powers your oscillators. You only pay for the water you use,so the power being generated by the turbine is free . This is how i run my garden light's.

[Pirate88179]

A blocking oscillator?
Nice name,but what actually is blocked?.
Current path diversion oscillator would be a better description.

Sure,you can decrease your power consumption by using these oscillators,but you also reduce your light output. So why not just use lower wattage light's ?. You could also put a small inline water turbine between your water supply meter and your home,so as every time you turn a tap on,the little turbine would charge a small battery bank that powers your oscillators. You only pay for the water you use,so the power being generated by the turbine is free . This is how i run my garden light's.

Actually, it does not decrease the light output as seen by our eyes.  Instead of turning on/off at 60 times/sec it turns on/off at about 30,000 times/sec and is off just as much as it is on so, I can run a very bright 40 watt equiv. led bulb for many, many hours form a "dead" AA battery.  the bulb is very bright but does not get hot as it is only drawing about 100 mA's.

The water turbine is a good idea as it makes no difference to the water company and you get "free energy".

Just so you know, I did not make up the term blocking oscillator, I was educated in this terminology by the likes of MarkE, TK, MH and .99.  I had always just called them a Joule Thief circuit.

Bill

[EMJunkie]

Where the heck did you get a claim of overunity from me in my post?  I have NEVER made that claim.

So, you are here to show concepts that work but you will not discuss measurements?  Isn't that eliminating the one thing that will show if it "works" or not?  If not for measurements (proper ones) how else can one demonstrate that something works as claimed?

I do not follow this logic at all.  Well, I will admit that self-looping would end all discussions on measurements but I do not recall you showing that either.

Did I miss something?

Bill

PS  In my videos I do claim Free Light as my friends give me their dead batteries that they were going to throw out and I use them to light my home.  Not overunity, just free light.  Last year, we had a blackout, and about 5 of my neighbors dropped by to ask why the power was on at my place and not theirs, ha ha.

Bill have you been hacked? Was this not you:

OK, sure...right.  It is obviously over your head Chris so you dismiss it.  Let me see you light 400 leds with a "dead" AA battery?  Can you do that?
Can you light a 48" floro tube with a single "dead" AA battery?
Can you light a gutted cfl with a singe AA battery?
Can you light an 800 lumen 40 watt equivalent led bulb with a single AA battery?

It is NOT a mechanical flasher with a solid state switch...once again, showing your ignorance.  It is simply a blocking oscillator which was invented in 1969 so, not 60 years old.  You spew crap and think they are facts when anyone with the most basic electronics knowledge knows it is crap.

I have still not seen you post any proof to your false claim of a 102% efficient transformer.  I expect you will dodge this yet again and reply with personal attacks.  How long will we have to wait for you to post some sort of proof for this claim?

I am guessing it will be a long, long time.  Why?  Because, like many of your other false claims, you have no evidence to back it up.  We all know this and so do you.

You make personal attacks when asked to back up your false claims.  I call you ignorant which is not a personal attack (look it up) it just means you do not know something.  This can be cured by reading a book which I suggest you do before embarrassing yourself any more than you already have.  A good example of your ignorance is your false statement about the Wright Brothers.  All that did was prove you knew nothing about aviation history.

Check out TK's JT videos and then get back here and tell everyone that they are useless.  I don't expect you will watch any of mine either because, you might actually learn something.  All of the lights in my house are driven by JT circuits but, hey, you are right, no real world practicalities.  I'll bet my electric bill is waaaay lower than yours.

Bill

There is a ton of statements in there that imply you're "Making" Electricity from Nothing!!!

400 leds with a "dead" AA battery?

So, you're saying, 0.24mw x 400 = 96 watts from No Current Source? A Dead Battery?

ref: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dead

12.  (Electronics) electronics
a. drained of electric charge; fully discharged: the battery was dead.

So, Bill has now, officially, through definition, Claimed OVER UNITY. Now his continued attack's on my work are no longer valid, he has done the same thing, made a Claim!!!

TK was just about where?  Lost in your fantasy world?  I don't think so Chris.  The bottom line is...TK's circuits work, yours do not.  End of story.  Finished.  Complete.  Done.

Go ahead and try to rewrite history like you tried with Tinman, it does not work here.  I know you will continue to make your FALSE CLAIMS but maybe you will soon realize that no one is listening.  At least, no one that knows anything about electronics.

Bill

It is ironic how things turn out.

Bill, I congratulate you!!!

I am not going to attack you, as you have done to me, instead, I am going to take your word on it, because I know that this is possible, and be happy that you have achieved something amazing!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: some of my work from more than 4 years ago: Physics Prof Steven E Jones Circuit Shows 8x Overunity

[Pirate88179]

Wow, you just proved you know nothing about joule thief circuits.  It is not magic, it is not overunity, just solid electronics which abide by the laws of physics.  Notice my " marks around the word dead?  As in, "dead" battery?  If you have a 1.5 volt AA battery in your electronic device (camera, ect) and it gets down to around 1.1 volts, that device will flash an icon telling you the battery is dead.  That device will no longer work.  So, you toss out those bats and put in new ones.  Then, you give them to me and I can light my home with them.  I am not talking about a battery with 0 voltage.

Man, you must have really skipped all of the basic electronics classes and, obviously, you do not have a working knowledge of the JT circuits.  As I have said repeatedly, no magic, no O.U. just free light for those that actually know how to use them.

Nice try in twisting my wording but, you left out the quote marks and, anyone that has ever played with a JT circuit knows what they can, and can not do.  Actually, my best JT's are still only about 80% efficient.  (Unlike your false claims of a 102% efficient transformer)  Now, study TK's vids as he has some that are way better than anything I ever made.  TK has never claimed O.U. either Chris.  Just remember, efficiency is good.  That is really all you need to know.

Still waiting on some kind of proof for that 102% efficient transformer.  I know you said you do not do measurements anymore but, then how do you know that transformer was not 10% if you never measured it?  You just guessed/hoped it was 102%?  You could just tell by looking at it?

Cool, tell the Nobel Prize folks that, I am sure they will accept that as proof.

Bill