Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

@Tinman,

I think you're getting Flux Linkage and Flux Leakage mixed up.

You are exactly right if you change the term to Linkage. Its just the one word that TK is trying to be picky about.

Flux Leakage, is more commonly known as "Leakage Flux" or "Loose Coupling" or "Loosely Coupled" device.

I have posted in the past, the document from George I Cohn "Electromagnetic Induction" is one of the best I have seen when it comes to this Field, Electromagnetism.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

No im not.
Faradays law states that a change in magnetic !flux!(the increase or decrease of a magnetic field) through a conducting loop creates an EMF in that loop.

Quote Wikipedia: According to Faraday's law of induction, since the same magnetic flux passes through both the primary and secondary windings in an ideal transformer,[7] a voltage is induced in each winding,

Soooo-if all the flux is contained within the core,and there is no flux leakage from that core,then how is an EMF produced in the conducting loop's???.
The answer is simple. The flux is not contained within any transformer core,as it also passes through the windings that are around the outside of the core.

Where you have an increase or decrease of magnetic field strength,you have a change in magnetic flux. Flux linkage is simply an alternative term for total flux. So, for there to be any flux linkage(magnetic flux),cutting the conductor,there has to be flux leakage from the magnetic core-->so no,the magnetic flux is not contained within the core.

[verpies]

If there is no flux leakage from the core, then how is the primary coupled to the secondary?

The magnetic flux does not need to touch the winding in order to induce emf/current in it.  This is a well known fact in EM engineering.

Merely increasing the winding diameter and keeping it further away from the core (and any flux leakage) does not change the induction.
If the flux leaks outside of the core then it can be detected by a small magnet, otherwise it cannot.  At 50/60Hz the vibration of the magnet can be felt by hand.  Deliberately creating a flux leakage from the core - decreases mutual inductance. 

According to legacy science the Faraday's induction happens magically at a distance....or if you prefer, because of a changing vector potential, that drives the electrons in the winding.  I am just quoting, this is not what I believe in.

[tinman]

If the flux leaks outside of the core then it can be detected by a small magnet, otherwise it cannot.  At 50/60Hz the vibration of the magnet can be felt by hand.  Deliberately creating a flux leakage from the core - decreases mutual inductance. 

According to legacy science the Faraday's induction happens magically at a distance....or if you prefer, because of a changing vector potential, that drives the electrons in the winding.  I am just quoting, this is not what I believe in.

The magnetic flux does not need to touch the winding in order to induce emf/current in it.  This is a well known fact in EM engineering.

How can that be correct when where ever there is a magnetic field there is magnetic flux.
Are you saying a magnetic field(and thus magnetic flux) are not needed to induce an EMF/current flow through a conductor?.

Merely increasing the winding diameter and keeping it further away from the core (and any flux leakage) does not change the induction.

This is not correct. The tighter the coupling from winding to core to secondary winding,the greater the inductive coupling between the primary and secondary windings. This can be clearly seen in the case when a primary is wound on say 30% of the toroids circumference ,and a secondary is wound on another 30% of the toroids circumference opposite that of the primary. The greater the distance between windings and core,the less the inductive coupling between the primary and secondary coils.

[minnie]

My pets have grown well, natural overunity!

[tinman]

My pets have grown well, natural overunity!

!dude!