Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 174 Guests are viewing this topic.

EMJunkie

So, Partnered Output Coils can be arranged to produce Excess output!

They work! It takes a bit of work, a bit of understanding, its not easy!

Why? You tell me!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

Quote

Why? You tell me!



It all starts with Induction, both Flux Linking and also Flux Cutting.

Floyd Sweet gives us some clues:

Quote

As polarity may be maintained constant , that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, and at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process.


and:

Quote

How does the Space Flux Coupled Alternator appear to operate beyond unity? An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:
Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship. The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity. This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat's displacement of the medium, water. Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction.

Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless. In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine hp would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect. This is reactive power – no work is done. The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship. The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.
In the case of the Space Flux Coupled machine, there is no visible entity. It's abstract. A steady state coherent force is present when brought under the influence of the electromagnetic controllable forces. It returns to an incoherent state when the initiating magnetic forces are absent (except in the case of a permanent magnet).

The feedback loop: Previously mentioned, you will more clearly see how the loop functions at the time you see the physical construction of the stationary armature of stator assembly. The underlying principal (forget Millikan's experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it's time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

Now you have it, pardon the pun, but, get a Bucking Move on!

Learn it, experiment all you can to find out all the little gems! Tinman has already very clearly shown all of you how simple this can be!

It's something you have to "bring to life" it lives and breaths, its a living machine! Like I said back on page 20:

Quote from: EMJunkie on January 25, 2015, 08:35:06 PM

I stated: "For every one device that works, expect 10 devices that don't. But, don't give up, keep trying." Page: 33 Second Paragraph!

You, like others seem to have some amazing myth that simply throwing three coils and sticking an AC input is going to work? Really, you need to re-think the entire thing!

It doesn't work like this! Its a Living Beast with a Heart Beat! One needs to bring it to life! Not expect it to Live!

Please don't expect! Just because your Expectations are too high especially when you're not prepared to do the work!


All you need is:

Three Coils, one exciter, 2 Output Coils, Partnered Output Coils.
Small Air Gap, Loose Coupling or Leakage Inductance, a means for Flux Cutting to Occur.
An Efficient means of Induction to occur in the first place from Input to Output to start the process off.

and of course some patience and time to learn what works and what doesn't.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: I have nearly spent a Year here, trying to convey these principals! I started this thread on: January 16, 2015

We have had some good reports from some people! Some excellent ones also, I thought Tinman's RT was going to start the ball rolling... Alas too many Boof Heads shot it down.

If we don't pick up the Ball, and get the Game going, we will all be out for a Duck! Its up to you! You have to do it for yourselves!

I am for sure certain your Governments are not going to do it for you!


dezeinstein

I'd offer my technique to eliminate the electron problem within magnetics, however, I will not give it up until I hold the Nobel Prize in my hands. The man who will NEVER... EVER get my ideas from OU.com is Tinsel Koala. He is downright ignorant, hasn't one clue how to change his ways to allow other people's thoughts , methods or  theories into his thick skull, so, I'd rather not share my incredible outcome with these devices with him or any other skeptic online ever.

I will need to partner with somebody who has the ability to test my devices and prove to the world that they work. There is pretty much a main ingredient that is new that is responsible for all of the successful work that I have done from 2010 until now. This is not a common or even practiced method for electronics or the electrical field, however, I stumbled upon new ways to make charges flow through substances that have shown nothing but a loss since copper is the one that shows massive fumbles once magnetized, especially under such loads that it starts to heat up.

Let's give you all a hint. We have to restrict the fields enough to a point that they only travel within the distance of the conductor we are going to collect or transfer power from. When overpowered, OU does not happen. When pulsed under large voltages, OU usually does not happen. When there is too much amperage, it usually goes away. When permeabilities are too high, it's chances diminish. There are a ton of variables I have encountered and, the best way to determine how we catch a break so we can obtain outside energies is to do what Mama said is best to do. Mama said " Keep it simple". That is my reality here.

I also try to properly plan my procedures when experimenting so we are not just winging it, freestyling it, whatever you may call it. Get an idea or vision in your head and immediately write it down.. It's that simple, but, write it detailed enough so nothing is left out.

I'd love to be able to share my inventions and the ideas that have become a reality with public, however, I have an investor that believes in me who has funded my projects with whatever I will ever need, even if that means I should profit from them. He doesn't care, he just wants a piece of what I get once the first invention is licensed, which it is well on it's way. There wasn't any such thing as a latching transformer until recently, when I accidentally wound a bobbin incorrectly because the wire was so small I couldn't see the direction, then, the new product was developed. I have found a few parts of the industry that coulkd use this as it has an advantageous effect. The first effect is that it eliminates several percent of the loading in an electrical circuit... Mostly for lighting, and, it has truly shown me that overunity is possible.

Let's speak a bit about collecting energy from the ionisphere. We can do so with a simple layer of a material over a substrate. This allows a lot of things to happen. The best part about this is that it is needed for grounding to allow scalar waves to be pumped into the Earth which allows us to receive these energy signals at a massive amplification as Tesla did, and, the best part of it all is that since it is grounded and feeds back from the Earth as it does a massive transformer core, we could receive from it power from the phase conjugate mirror as tesla did, however, Tesla did not have this substance which is highly practical for my theoretica;l application. The energy likes to be attracted to very specific shapes, an it is harmless to humans even though it may kill us if we touch the loaded output/.

These energies do not normally have a lot of current, but, my device with this substance allows for massive energy conversion, or amplification to give it a massive current from this normally useless electrical feed. Ion Power Group has shown their ability to draw in it's voltage, but, they will need my method to turn the high voltage into something that allow this all to happen.

Good Ideas Posted To Overunity.com are great, especially when they function correctly as shown.  I really wish OU.com wouldn't allow folks like tinsel koala to sign up,  log in and trash talk just about anybody who claims they got something working.. then he goes to work only trying to disprove them with a physics book and his test equipment.. if that is what you can even call it.. LOL

Overunity is just that. according to the laws, it can't exist, so, wouldn't those of who feel the necessity to debunk it all maybe try not using physics as a tool to debunk anything that would normally defy those laws for the simple fact that their only answer to the fight is the answer of how physics works?  The point I'm getting at here is to stop these guys from ruining our experience here so none of us who have actually succeeded in creating a working product have to speak how they work, or feel they need to fight to tell these dummies that they are wrong , then, they demand an answer as to how it works. I simply will not bow so low. They will get blocked as they do elsewhere, reported, etc. The point is this... If physics were perfect, nobody would have any overunity effect from any one of their devices. There's obviously missing data and variables, as well as entire components lines that share a whole new missing variable that electric laws and physics don't even know about yet. These guys think they are all over the game but the fact is that they are nothing but a nusiance on all of our sides and should be banned from the forum the second they act up or even have a dimeanor that belittles one person for trying to share their visions, thoughts, builds, opinions, and methods of how they acquired their results, etc.

Most of those guys aren't here to share their two cents worth, they are here only to speak down to and belittle credible and valuable members who make OU.com great..  Tinsel isn't just on OU.com, he approaches folks on the tube, and every other place where free energy devices ae, and, he keeps  telling us that we aren't testing circuits  right, we don't know how, we didn't calculate the results correctly, or, we need to get an education, tell us we aren't who we are, don't have the right equipment to do the next test                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           , or we don't know how to use it etc. I think as a man of nearly 30 years in the electrical field and many credentials in my field of high voltage electrical systems, I am experienced enough to know what overunity is, especially when i have a device that inputs 6 watts and ouitputs 3000 watts at a full voltage. The power factor starts on the input side at 30 and exits the machine at 99. That tells us all something., and it doesn't only prove that it corrects the power factor, it proves that it improves the power as it transforms it.

All these people have to offer us members is a complete line of crap that is only disturbing other members and it needs to stop completely.

EMJunkie

Quote from: dezeinstein on November 30, 2015, 08:27:23 PM

I'd offer my technique to eliminate the electron problem within magnetics, however, I will not give it up until I hold the Nobel Prize in my hands. The man who will NEVER... EVER get my ideas from OU.com is Tinsel Koala.




Well, I am not so interested in a Nobel Prize! I want nothing in return except for a Future! A Future for all!

Right now, we are all slaves to the One World Order Machine! The hand full of Douchebags that have self appointed themselves as our new government!

Yes, I have had many run in's with the Goon Squad - TK is a shocker.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org