Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Please present an example where you invalidate Lenz!  Turning the phase 180° truly, doesn't mean you got rid of Lenz, what it means is that Lenz's law is now effectively controlling consumption increase versus consumption decrease.  I know this because I practice what I preach.  I didn't need to reinterpret that which we were left with to do it either.


Come on!


Screw all this diagram stuff and get to the bench, show the principles working!

Erfinder - There is no TEAM in Me or you.

You would be able to see an example if you were still a member of my private forum. Instead you created waves.

Again, and again, and again, I refer you to one of my videos that is quite a few years old now.

Solid State Generator - How to Build and tune a Solid State Electrical Generator!!! - Low Level OU


If you cant replicate my video and results then please feel free to visit another thread! I am not here to do one on one breast feeding sessions!!!

Hear, hear - Mr Polarisz is exactly right!!!

The demonstration I put on YouTube back in Nov 2, 2014; Solid State Generator - How to Build and tune a Solid State Electrical Generator!!! - Low Level OU, was at the time, nearly 2 years old.

If the output is maximised and there is a tuned point, which I show you how to get to it, then once there, you can work on minimising the Input.

I clearly show you, there is no Lenz's Effects when tuned!

Once this frequency is determined, then Resonate the input at this frequency, it can give you a very good gain after some fiddling.

Come on, please Inventors, Study carefully, replicate carefully. It does work!!!

Below, an image of my 2013 experiment:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

For others, Again Faradays law is a Generalisation.

If Lenz's Law is not (-), which as we have talked about is Anti-Phase or 180 degrees, then it is no longer (-)   -   Is it?

Mathematically it will become (∠) of the Angle that is measured.

Now clearly:   (-) is not (∠)

So, Lenz Law will become invalid.

So Faradays Law should be written: E.M.F = ∠ N dϕ_B / dt

Clearly this equation does not correctly predict the E.M.F however. Why?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

When I say this, I really want to be clear.

This Angle is not fixed and should be something that you as a Researcher should be looking at. That is, if youre not already.

One example: 32.1

This is from the E.M.F on the Input, to the E.M.F on the Output. Oh yes, of course, this is inverted. So we would normally see this shift as: 147.9

Much better than this can be achieved.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

But, please, don't take my word for it!

Like I have said all along, please replicate my work, look for the same effects, and study carefully. This is about as cheap a Research experiment that you're ever going to be able to do and get the most benefit from.

Then improve on the device from there...


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: This was one experiment I did on this Device after a few mods to improve:

[EMJunkie]

Where of course one would normally see:

Which is Lenz's Law (-) Anti Phase.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org